RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Open MacroEconomics, as of April 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Open MacroEconomics, these are 167 authors affiliated with 537 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Open MacroEconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-OPM (Open MacroEconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.54Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
34.45Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
44.61International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
55.99Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz
66.18Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
77Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
87.26Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
(9)7.92Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
99.29Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
109.75Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1113.91Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm
1214.73European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
1315.92Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(14)16.12Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1316.12Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1518.27Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(16)18.79Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1518.79Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1719.28Økonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, København
1819.49Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco
(19)19.69Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1921.43Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
2024.37Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
2126.07Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2226.35Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
2326.36Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2428.13National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(25)30.28Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(25)30.5Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2530.67ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
2630.88Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis

Top 5% authors in the field of Open MacroEconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.63Nathan Balke
2.2.01Lars E. O. Svensson
3.3.72Eswar Prasad
4.4.69Joshua Aizenman
5.5.61David VanHoose
6.6.68Robert Kollmann
7.6.71Christopher Otrok
8.7.42Ayhan Kose

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.