RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Sociology of Economics, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Sociology of Economics, these are 141 authors affiliated with 423 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Sociology of Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-SOG (Sociology of Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.34Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.27Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.37Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.06Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
45.39Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
58.35Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
68.38Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
78.63Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
88.73Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
99.55Department of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City
(10)11.4School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
911.4Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1112.71Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1213.89ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(13)14.4Department of Finance and Economics, School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1214.4School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1415.57Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1516.87Department of Public Policy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
1618.39Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(17)19.22European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(17)19.93Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1720.48National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1822.66Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
1925.22Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2025.78Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2126.43Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

Top 5% authors in the field of Sociology of Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.12Bruno S. Frey
2.2.28Paul A. Samuelson
3.3.83John Geweke
4.4.89Richard S.J. Tol
5.5.19Andrew J. Oswald
6.6.2Shulamit Kahn
7.6.53Dan Ben-David

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.