RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 76 authors affiliated with 280 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.18Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.22Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.96Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.18Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.82Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(4)6.8Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(4)7.71School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
37.71Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
58.28Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
610.48Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
710.64Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(8)13.18Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
713.18College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
915.07Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1016.42Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1117.76Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
(12)18.36Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
(12)18.56Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1118.56Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1319.42Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
(14)20.38Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1421.63Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Top 5% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Peter Nijkamp
2.3.74Anastasios Xepapadeas
3.3.77Robert Norman Stavins

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.