RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 299 authors affiliated with 941 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.4Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.42Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.54Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.33Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.17Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
68.26Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
78.57Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
89.97Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
910.35Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1011.43Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.46Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)13.17Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)13.19Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)13.32Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1217.92World Bank Group, Washington
1318.54Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1420.02Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1520.22Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(16)20.98Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1622.87Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1724.43Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1824.98Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1926.82Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
2028.18School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
(21)28.82School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2028.82Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2229.19Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2329.84Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2430.89Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2531.03National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
2632.02Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2732.34Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2834.06Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
2935.37Brookings Institution, Washington
3036.2Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3136.63School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3237.15Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3337.81Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3438.24Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3539.41Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3640.59Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
3741.69Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
(38)41.93Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3845.81London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3948.54Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4051.04Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
4152.54Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
4253.13Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(43)53.39Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
4253.39College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
4455.24Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College
4555.26Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
4655.63Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
4755.73Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.74Ernst Fehr
2.1.83Bruno S. Frey
3.3.87Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.44Paul R. Krugman
5.5.03Bruce D. Smith †
6.5.23Dani Rodrik
7.8.49Douglass C. North
8.8.82Oliver D. Hart
9.10.64Rudiger Dornbusch †
10.10.95William Baumol
11.11.37János Kornai
12.11.81Herbert Gintis
13.13.14John Moore
14.13.35David Laidler

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.