RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Open MacroEconomics, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Open MacroEconomics, these are 155 authors affiliated with 531 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Open MacroEconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-OPM (Open MacroEconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.57Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
34.42Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
44.87International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
55.87Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz
66.05Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(7)7.22Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
77.25Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
88.9Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
99.07Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
109.11Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1113.53Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm
(12)14.67Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1114.67Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1315.63European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
1415.88Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1517.93Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(16)18.15Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1518.15Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1718.49Økonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, København
(18)19.08Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1819.67Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco
1920.22Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
2023.17Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
2124.67Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2224.89Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2327.05Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
(24)28.59Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2428.65Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis
(25)30.46Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2531Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
2631.14Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Open MacroEconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.56Nathan Balke
2.2.02Lars E. O. Svensson
3.3.68Eswar Prasad
4.4.25Joshua Aizenman
5.5.2David VanHoose
6.5.67Christopher Otrok
7.7.38Giancarlo Corsetti

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.