RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 76 authors affiliated with 400 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).
RankScoreInstitution
12.32Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(1)2.32Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
22.88International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(3)2.99Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.99Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
44.23Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
55.71World Bank Group, Washington
(6)7.26Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
67.46Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
710.42Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
812.36Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
912.73Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1012.94Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(11)15.67Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1117.48Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(12)19.77Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1220.97Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1321.84Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1422.6Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1522.61Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
1624.92Brookings Institution, Washington
(17)26.51Global Economy and Development Program, Brookings Institution, Washington
1726.59Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(17)26.59Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1827.45Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(19)28.85Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1928.95Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (WIFO), Wien
2030.59College of Business, Indiana State University, Terre Haute
(20)30.59Networks Financial Institute, College of Business, Indiana State University, Indianapolis

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.39Eswar Prasad
2.2.75Ayhan Kose
3.3.7Ramon Lopez

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.