RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of March 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 119 authors affiliated with 348 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.31Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.37Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
23.02Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.31Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.65Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
46.35Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
56.87Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
67.01ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
77.69Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(8)10.07Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
811.6Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
914.75Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1015.2Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1116.08Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1217.33Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(12)17.33Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(13)17.73Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(13)18.75European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(13)19.86Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1320.3National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1421.47School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(15)22.17Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1523.03Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1624School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
1724.85Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.3.19William R. Johnson
3.4.06Jean Gabszewicz
4.4.31Alan Beggs
5.5.66Matthew Aaron Gentzkow

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.