RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Sociology of Economics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Sociology of Economics, these are 134 authors affiliated with 415 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Sociology of Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-SOG (Sociology of Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.79Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.42Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(3)2.83Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.01Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
44.55Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
56.29Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
68.62Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
78.69Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
89.42Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
99.76Department of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City
(10)10.91School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
910.91Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1112.93Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1212.98Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(13)13.55Department of Finance and Economics, School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1213.55School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1413.64ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(15)18.21Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1519.34Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(16)19.93European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
1621.55Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1722.36Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
1824.31Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
1925.06Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy
2026.04Department of Public Policy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv

Top 5% authors in the field of Sociology of Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.28Paul A. Samuelson
2.2.73John Geweke
3.3.63Richard S.J. Tol
4.4.01Andrew J. Oswald
5.4.34Shulamit Kahn
6.6.25John J. Siegfried

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.