RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 73 authors affiliated with 273 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.1Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.12Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
23.35Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.54Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.46Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(4)7.68School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
37.68Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
58.26Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
68.47Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(7)10.47Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
710.7Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
811.75Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(9)13.22Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
813.22College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1014.74Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(11)17.78Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1118.48Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1218.58Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
(13)21.24Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1322.47Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam

Top 5% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Peter Nijkamp
2.3.57Robert Norman Stavins
3.3.86Anastasios Xepapadeas

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.