RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 120 authors affiliated with 406 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.58World Bank Group, Washington
(2)2.71Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
24.25Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(2)4.25Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
34.32Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
44.51Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
54.91Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
67.48Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
710.46Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
811.81Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
912.43Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(10)12.48Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
1012.79Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1114.65Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
1216.82Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1317.1Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1418.32Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1519.03Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1620.15Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(16)20.15Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1720.56Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
1820.82Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
1921.46Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
2022.48Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.96Abdullah Yavas
2.2.16Erik Brynjolfsson
3.2.33John Vickers
4.3.44Philip E. Graves
5.5.1David F. Burgess
6.6.77Elise S. Brezis

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.