RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 298 authors affiliated with 926 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.42Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.45Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.63Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
44.86Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.12Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
69.61Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
710.14Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
810.46Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
910.57Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1011.9Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1113.31Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(12)13.42Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1213.99Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1314.16Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1415.99Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
(15)16.73Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1517.22World Bank Group, Washington
(16)18.29Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1620.55Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(17)20.7Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1721.07School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1823.15Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1924.73Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
2025.06Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2127.33Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
(22)28.28School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2128.28Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2329.22Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2430.8School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2531.48Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2631.64Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
2731.67Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2834.52Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2935.13Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
3036.28London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3137.18Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3237.37Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3339.71Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
3439.97National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
3540.17Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3640.58Brookings Institution, Washington
(37)45.99Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
3645.99College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
3846.92Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
(39)48.07Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3949.28Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
4052.7Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
4152.93Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
4254.3Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson
4355.12Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College
4455.28Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
4555.33Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
4655.34Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.76Ernst Fehr
2.1.9Bruno S. Frey
3.3.94Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.37Bruce D. Smith †
5.4.43Paul R. Krugman
6.5.13Dani Rodrik
7.8.38Douglass C. North
8.8.88Oliver D. Hart
9.10.28Rudiger Dornbusch †
10.11.05János Kornai
11.11.44William Baumol
12.12.44Herbert Gintis
13.12.73David Laidler
14.13.18John Moore

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.