RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Open MacroEconomics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Open MacroEconomics, these are 145 authors affiliated with 504 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Open MacroEconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-OPM (Open MacroEconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.12Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.47Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
33.27Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
44.54Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
55.93International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
66.76Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz
76.82Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
87.72Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
98.59Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1012.25Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1115.1Økonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, København
(12)15.17Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1215.32Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm
1315.88Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
(13)15.88Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
(14)16.98Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1417.19Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1517.22European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
1617.99Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
(16)17.99Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1718.28Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
1818.79Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
1920.16Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco
2021.75Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2123.56Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
2226.44Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
(23)28.08Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2228.08Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2428.52Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
2528.56Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis

Top 5% authors in the field of Open MacroEconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.17Nathan Balke
2.3.16Eswar Prasad
3.3.54Joshua Aizenman
4.4.15Christopher Otrok
5.4.38David VanHoose
6.5.81Caroline Marie Betts
7.7.37Ayhan Kose

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.