RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Intellectual Property Rights, these are 234 authors affiliated with 523 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Intellectual Property Rights

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IPR (Intellectual Property Rights).
RankScoreInstitution
11.77Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
23.39Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
33.82London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
44.58Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
54.62Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
68.12ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
78.9Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
89.55Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
911.19International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(10)11.51European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
1011.72Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
1111.77Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1213.9Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis", Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino
1314.73Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1416.61Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1517.59School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
1617.99Department of Economics, Kyung Hee University, Seoul
1718.91Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1820.09Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies (KITeS/CESPRI), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
1920.14Economics Department, University of Essex, Colchester
2020.37United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute of Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht
2120.78Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto
(22)21.16Applied Economics Workshop, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2221.53Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena
2323.27Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
2423.67Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2523.71Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2624.49Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel

Top 5% authors in the field of Intellectual Property Rights

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.04Sudipto Bhattacharya
2.2.08William R. Johnson
3.3.66Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
4.6.97David Theodore Coe
5.8.14Iain M. Cockburn
6.8.15Jeong-Yoo Kim
7.8.55Guido Cozzi
8.8.7Dietmar Harhoff
9.9.97David Genesove
10.10.37David Joseph Salant
11.11.02Yongmin Chen

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.