RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Game Theory, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Game Theory, these are 582 authors affiliated with 749 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Game Theory

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-GTH (Game Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.97Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.07Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.27Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
33.57Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
45.31Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
56.24Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
67.83ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
79.01Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
89.76Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
910.52Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
1012.75Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
1113.03Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(12)14.45Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1114.45Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1315.05Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
1417.21Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1517.66Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1618.01Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1718.76Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
(18)19.64Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science (CMS-EMS), Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
1820.36Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1920.54Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
2021.05Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
2122.26Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2225.13Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2327.77School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2428.02Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
2529.86Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
(26)30.54Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2631.94Division of Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
2732.36Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2832.46Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris
2936.16Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
3036.47Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
3137.59Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
3238.4School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
3338.96School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
3439.21Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
(35)39.26Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
3439.26College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
3639.82Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
3741.14Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Game Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.18Ernst Fehr
2.2.6Paul Milgrom
3.3.55Drew Fudenberg
4.5.32Stephen Morris
5.5.42Vincent P. Crawford
6.6.31David Knudsen Levine
7.7.5Matthew O. Jackson
8.8.95Colin Camerer
9.9.5Ehud Kalai
10.9.56Robert Butler Wilson
11.11.45Sergiu Hart
12.15.35Philip J. Reny
13.15.45Robert Sugden
14.15.83George J. Mailath
15.16.8Joel Sobel
16.17.14Philippe Jehiel
17.17.35Mamoru Kaneko
18.18Ted Bergstrom
19.20.23Martin Shubik
20.21.66H. Peyton Young
21.23.94Lin Zhou
22.24.21Herve Moulin
23.24.36Charles A. Holt
24.24.47Jacques Crémer
25.24.74Benny Moldovanu
26.25.27Roberto Serrano
27.25.62James Andreoni
28.27.18Olivier Compte
29.27.24R. Mark Isaac

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.