RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 117 authors affiliated with 344 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.31Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.37Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.99Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.27Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.97Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
46.99ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
57Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
67.04Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
77.64Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(8)9.76Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
810.7Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
912.32Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1015.01Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1116.1Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1217.3Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(12)17.3Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(13)17.54Applied Economics Workshop, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1320.05Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(14)21.04European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(14)21.09Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(14)21.62Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1422.01School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
1522.47School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1623.04Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1723.35Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.3.22William R. Johnson
3.4.13Jean Gabszewicz
4.4.28Alan Beggs
5.5.35Matthew Aaron Gentzkow

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.