RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of China, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For China, these are 190 authors affiliated with 454 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of China

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CNA (China).
RankScoreInstitution
11.18World Bank Group, Washington
(2)2.32Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
23.28Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.69Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.95Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
48.42Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
58.76Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
610.87Department of Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
711.51International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
811.87Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto
(9)12.14Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
913.39Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis
1013.42International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington
(11)13.99Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1115.63Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(12)15.94Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1216.59Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz
1318.37Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1419.37Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
(14)19.37Business Economics, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto
1520.73Economics Program, Research School of Social Sciences (RSSS), Australian National University, Canberra
1623.34School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
(17)24.12Department of Economics, Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
1624.12Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
1824.16Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
1925.68Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(20)26.39Macroeconomics and Growth Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2026.5Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
2126.81Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2228.54Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam

Top 5% authors in the field of China

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.35David Dollar
2.2.98Martin Ravallion
3.4.59John B Knight
4.4.71Simeon Djankov
5.4.74John Whalley
6.5.4Junsen Zhang
7.5.57Adam Wagstaff
8.6.62GĂ©rard Roland
9.7.19Shang-Jin Wei

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.