RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Computational Economics, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Computational Economics, these are 413 authors affiliated with 861 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Computational Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CMP (Computational Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.05Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
23.11Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
33.44Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
44.92Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
55.18Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(6)7.43Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
67.49Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
78Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
89.29Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
99.39Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1010.86Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
1111.97Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
1212.02Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
1313.48Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1414.46Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(15)15.18Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project (COPS), Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
1515.48Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1616.55Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames
1718.77Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1819.11Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1921.61Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
2025.1Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2127.69Department of Economics, University of Texas-Austin, Austin
2227.76School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney
2328.4ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
2428.41Economics Department, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
2529.18CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
(26)29.9Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2629.93Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
2732.02Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
2833.16Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2934.45Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
3034.74School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
3137.17Economics Program, National Science Foundation, Government of the United States, Washington
3237.18International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
3339.78Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3440.8Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
3541.6Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3642.85European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
3743.99Economics Department, State University of New York-Oswego (SUNY), Oswego
3844.3Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing
3945.73Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
4046.07Department of Economics, State University of New York-Buffalo (SUNY), Buffalo
4146.12Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
4246.23Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
4346.96Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London

Top 5% authors in the field of Computational Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.21Christopher Sims
2.3.95Richard S.J. Tol
3.4.27David W. Wilcox
4.5.28Alan V. Deardorff
5.6.38Erik Brynjolfsson
6.6.48Margaret Emily Slade
7.6.52Leigh S Tesfatsion
8.7.31David Andrew Kendrick
9.9.68Andrew Feltenstein
10.10.34Edward C. Norton
11.12William L. Goffe
12.13.84Angelo Melino
13.14.03Peter Bishop Dixon
14.14.25Blake Lebaron
15.15.51Jack P.C. Kleijnen
16.15.89Jasmina Arifovic
17.16.67Paul Contoyannis
18.17.38Juan F Rubio-Ramirez
19.18.82Daniel Ackerberg
20.19.07Bernard SalaniƩ

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.