RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Experimental Economics, as of December 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Experimental Economics, these are 540 authors affiliated with 751 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Experimental Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-EXP (Experimental Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
22.37CESifo, München
33.49National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
45.01Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
56.25Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(6)6.51Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
66.62Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
77.23Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
88.16Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
910.92Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
1012.47Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1112.7Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1212.86Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1313.15Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1414.73Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science (ICES), George Mason University, Fairfax
1516.85Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1617.92Center for Economic Design, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul
1617.92Cato Institute, Washington
1818.12Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1921.19School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
(20)22.3Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
2022.59CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
2122.61Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2122.61Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2324.21Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
2425.44Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
2526.34Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
2627.28Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
2727.97Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2828.11Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2928.49Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
3031.9Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
3133.28Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
3235.41Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
(33)35.71Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
3335.75Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
3439.31Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
3540.95Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
3641.03Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm
3741.04Department of Economics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham

Top 5% authors in the field of Experimental Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.15Bruno S. Frey
2.2.45Vernon L. Smith
3.4.87John H. Kagel
4.4.91John List
5.5.07Ernst Fehr
6.7.37Andrew Schotter
7.7.37Charles A. Holt
8.8.13Vincent P. Crawford
9.8.79Robert W. Rosenthal †
10.9.01Simon Gächter
11.11.99Benno Torgler
12.12.76James Andreoni
13.13.37Gary Charness
14.13.38Klaus M. Schmidt
15.16.57Kevin McCabe
16.16.75Andrew Foster
17.16.76John Denis Hey
18.17.52Armin Falk
19.19.28James Marvin Walker
20.19.95Glenn W. Harrison
21.20.94Reinhard Selten
22.21.79Joel Sobel
23.23.84Gary E. Bolton
24.24.99John Duffy
25.25.19Timothy Cason
26.25.5Louis Putterman
27.25.6Magnus Johannesson

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.