Only works listed on RePEc and claimed as theirs by registered authors are counted.
Number of abstract views in the past 12 months (January 2008-December 2008) on the various RePEc sites (IDEAS, EconPapers, Socionet, NEP). For details, see LogEc.
The score of each work is divided by the number of authors.
Authors are attributed equally and proportionally to each institution they claimed to be affiliated with.
Institutions are then attributed to the country or state of their location.
Same ranking by individual authors or economic institutions. All country or state rankings.Click on region names to obtain local ranking. More rankings. The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
