RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of November 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Resource Economics, these are 66 authors affiliated with 264 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.3Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
22.57Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
33.5Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(4)3.65Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
44.3National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(5)4.85Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
57.13Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
68.22Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(7)11.74Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(6)11.74Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
712.37CESifo, München
813.99Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(9)14.26School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
814.26Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1015.12Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
1115.72Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
1215.97Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1316.53National Centre for Econometric Research (NCER), Brisbane/Sydney
1316.53Institute of Local Public Finance (ILPF), Langen

Top 5% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Peter Nijkamp
2.3.05Anastasios Xepapadeas
3.4.36Fredrik Carlsson

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.