Field Rankings at IDEAS: Economics of Ageing

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of November 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Economics of Ageing, these are 109 authors affiliated with 315 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
Rank Score Institution

1 1.04 Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn

2 2.02 RAND, Santa Monica

3 3.32 Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London

4 3.62 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge

5 4.64 Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin

6 6.24 Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge

7 9.82 Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

8 10.32 Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge

9 12.05 School of Management and Economics, Queen's University, Belfast

10 13.34 Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge

(11) 14.9 Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica

11 16.53 Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton

(11) 16.53 Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton

11 16.53 Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton

13 16.82 Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington

14 17.25 Department of Economics, New York University, New York City

(15) 17.49 ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London

15 17.91 International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1.14	David Bloom
2.	2.42	Neil Bruce
3.	2.89	David Canning
4.	3.96	Timothy Aaron Waidmann
5.	6.74	Alexander W. Hoffmaister

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.04	Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
2	2.02	RAND, Santa Monica
3	3.32	Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
4	3.62	National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
5	4.64	Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
6	6.24	Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
7	9.82	Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
8	10.32	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
9	12.05	School of Management and Economics, Queen's University, Belfast
10	13.34	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(11)	14.9	Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
11	16.53	Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(11)	16.53	Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
11	16.53	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
13	16.82	Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
14	17.25	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(15)	17.49	ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
15	17.91	International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington