RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Experimental Economics, as of October 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Experimental Economics, these are 520 authors affiliated with 720 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Experimental Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-EXP (Experimental Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
22.43CESifo, München
33.59National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
44.66Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
55.86Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(6)6.31Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
66.96Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
77.31Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
88.16Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
910.56Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
1012.82Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1113.25Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1213.67Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1313.95Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1414.08Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science (ICES), George Mason University, Fairfax
1517.05Center for Economic Design, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul
1517.05Cato Institute, Washington
1717.67Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1820.1Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1920.61Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2020.72School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
2121.73CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
2222.5Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2324.04Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
2424.64Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
(25)25.09Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
2526.75Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2627.07Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
2728.43Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2828.65Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
2929.68Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3032.75Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
3134.02Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
3234.29Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
(33)35.38Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
3336.21Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3437.03Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
3540.55Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
3642.01Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

Top 5% authors in the field of Experimental Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.15Bruno S. Frey
2.2.32Vernon L. Smith
3.4.33John List
4.4.83Ernst Fehr
5.5.68John H. Kagel
6.7.46Andrew Schotter
7.8.04Charles A. Holt
8.8.5Robert W. Rosenthal †
9.8.77Vincent P. Crawford
10.9.23Simon Gächter
11.11.47Benno Torgler
12.12.85Klaus M. Schmidt
13.12.91James Andreoni
14.13.34Gary Charness
15.16.13Andrew Foster
16.16.72John Denis Hey
17.17.65Armin Falk
18.18.31Kevin McCabe
19.19.49James Marvin Walker
20.19.71Reinhard Selten
21.20.24Glenn W. Harrison
22.21.15Gary E. Bolton
23.23.15Timothy Cason
24.23.23Joel Sobel
25.24.02Louis Putterman
26.24.93John Duffy

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.