RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management, as of July 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Human Capital & Human Resource Management, these are 344 authors affiliated with 772 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HRM (Human Capital & Human Resource Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.14Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
21.97National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
33.5Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
44.6Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
56.05RAND, Santa Monica
66.22CESifo, München
77.06Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
810.06Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
910.16ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(10)11.89European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(10)12.87Department of Finance and Business Economics, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
912.87Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(11)13.12Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1113.4World Bank Group, Washington
1213.62Centre de recherche en Économie (OFCE), Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, Paris
1314.71Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
1417.73Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1518.65Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
1618.7Department of Economics, University College London, University of London, London
1719.43American Bar Foundation (ABF), Chicago
1821.75Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1922.05Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
2023.71Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2123.8Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini
2224.27Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(23)24.82Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2325.9Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2426.6Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
2527.41Economics Program, Research School of Social Sciences (RSSS), Australian National University, Canberra
(26)27.76School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2628.42Department of Economics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham
2730.33Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2830.38Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
2930.53Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3030.82Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3132.23Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD), Torino
3232.41Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
3334.72London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3435.81Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
3536.68Facoltà di Economia, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma
3637.3Department of Economics, University of Texas-Austin, Austin
3738DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
3838.58Economics Department, Brown University, Providence

Top 5% authors in the field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.65Philippe Weil
2.2.34Kevin J. Murphy
3.3.57Eric A. Hanushek
4.4.31David B. Audretsch
5.4.39Lorne Hugh Carmichael
6.6.57Oded Galor
7.9Richard J. Murnane
8.9.36Mark Huggett
9.10.56Tim Sass
10.11.25Barbara L. Wolfe
11.12.11Dan Ben-David
12.12.77Paul William Glewwe
13.13.8Ian Jewitt
14.14.82Sandra E. Black
15.16.94Andres Erosa
16.17.56Zoltan J. Acs
17.19.16Daniele Checchi

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.