RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of July 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Cultural Economics, these are 92 authors affiliated with 295 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.2Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
22.24Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)2.67Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.5Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
45.12Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
56.64Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
66.65National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
77.92ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(8)8.21Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(8)10.75Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
811.12Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
911.54Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1011.87Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1111.94Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
1213.4Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1317.11Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(14)18.42European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(14)18.74Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1419.06Department of Economics, European University Institute, Firenze

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.3.22William R. Johnson
3.3.24Jean Gabszewicz
4.4.52Alan Beggs

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.