RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Environmental Economics, as of June 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Environmental Economics, these are 570 authors affiliated with 744 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Environmental Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-ENV (Environmental Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.27National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
23.12Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
33.4Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
43.89Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
54.98Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(6)5.53Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(6)8.5Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
68.69CESifo, München
78.98Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
89.16Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
910.24Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1010.72Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1113.41Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1213.96Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1316.17Department of Economics, University of Texas-Austin, Austin
1419.5Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1519.7Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1620.03Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary
1720.12World Bank Group, Washington
1821.05Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
1921.75Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
2024.1Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
2126.65Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(22)27.38Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2229.73Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames
2330.04Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2430.35Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2530.71Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
2630.77School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
2731.24International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
2831.77Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2932.75Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
3033.34Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3133.99Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
3235.11Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(33)36.6Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
3337.07AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington
3437.94Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis (CAMA),
3538.01Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3639.05Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
3740Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Environmental Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.44Wallace E. Oates
2.3.81Peter Nijkamp
3.4.29Martin L. Weitzman
4.4.88Don Fullerton
5.5.43Douglass C. North
6.6.67James Bradford DeLong
7.7.39Robert Norman Stavins
8.8.51Brian R. Copeland
9.9.15Robert W. Hahn
10.10.81Richard S.J. Tol
11.10.88Benno Torgler
12.11.01Wayne B. Gray
13.11.06M. Scott Taylor
14.11.53William A. Brock
15.11.53Arik Levinson
16.11.75Robert Owen Mendelsohn
17.15.29Larry S. Karp
18.16.25Dallas Burtraw
19.16.64Per G. Fredriksson
20.17.16Richard T. Carson
21.19.01Ian Parry
22.21.45Peter J Wilcoxen
23.21.76Karen Palmer
24.23.59Gilbert Metcalf
25.25.13Susan Athey
26.25.22Carlo Carraro
27.25.48Ary Lans Bovenberg
28.26.09William A. Pizer

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.