RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Discrete Choice Models, as of June 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Discrete Choice Models, these are 300 authors affiliated with 740 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Discrete Choice Models

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-DCM (Discrete Choice Models).
RankScoreInstitution
11.66National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.17Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
33.18Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
44.19Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
55.02Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(6)5.58Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(6)7.57Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
68.02Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
79.32Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
89.47Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
99.57Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
109.58Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1111.1American Bar Foundation (ABF), Chicago
1212.28Department of Economics, University College London, University of London, London
1314.26Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1415.76Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD), Torino
1518.14Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1618.52CESifo, München
(17)20.22ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1620.22Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
1821.39Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1924.6Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York
2025.29Economics Department, University of Arizona, Tucson
2127.92Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2228.29Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Government of Norway, Oslo
(23)29.04Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
2229.04College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
(24)29.17School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2329.17Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2529.41Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris I), Paris
2630.82Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
2730.86Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
2832.4Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2932.49Stiftelsen Frischsenteret for samfunnsøkonomisk forskning, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
3033.72Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
3137.88CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
(32)38.49Econometrics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3239.06Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3339.91Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
3440.85Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
3542.17Paris School of Economics, Paris
3642.25Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis", Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino
3743.3Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona

Top 5% authors in the field of Discrete Choice Models

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.11James J. Heckman
2.2.95Kenneth Train
3.3.05Lin Zhou
4.7.55Pravin K Trivedi
5.7.65Mark Stewart
6.7.94Edward Vytlacil
7.9.11Daniel Ackerberg
8.9.13Caroline van Rijckeghem
9.9.65Thierry Magnac
10.11.22Steven Allen
11.11.66Rainer Winkelmann
12.11.79Fredrik Carlsson
13.12.97Andrew Michael Jones
14.13.27Ian J. Bateman
15.14.51John K. Dagsvik

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.