RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Happiness, as of May 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Economics of Happiness, these are 61 authors affiliated with 279 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Happiness

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HAP (Economics of Happiness).
RankScoreInstitution
11.31Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
22.03Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
32.44Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(4)3.5Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
45.68Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
56.24National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
68.29Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(7)8.83Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
710.74Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(7)10.74Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
811.34CESifo, München
(9)11.69Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
912.46Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
(10)13.43School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
913.43Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1113.72Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1214.03Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1319.18Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Happiness

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.53Andrew J. Oswald
2.1.59John B Knight
3.3.3Andrew Clark

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.