RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Law & Economics, as of January 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Law & Economics, these are 365 authors affiliated with 722 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Law & Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-LAW (Law & Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.41Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
32.73Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
44.26Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
55.13Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
66.35Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(7)7.49Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
78.71School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
810.21Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
910.5Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
1010.82Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1112.05World Bank Group, Washington
(12)13.22Finance Group, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
1214.23London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1315.92Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1416.83Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1517.05Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
1618.31Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1719.02Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(18)19.27Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1820.6Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1922.91Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2023.27Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2124.45William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
(22)24.68Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2225.14CESifo, München
2327.64Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Fisciano
2429Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
2429Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs
(26)31.15Center for Research on Employment and Economic Growth, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
2631.66Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2732.25Dipartimento di Economia, Università degli Studi di Napoli - "Federico II", Napoli
2832.46DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
2932.68Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3035.3Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3137.35Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
3239Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
3339.63Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
3441.71Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3542.54Jevons Institute for Competition Law and Economics, University College London, University of London, London
3642.71Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris

Top 5% authors in the field of Law & Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.16Andrei Shleifer
2.3.4Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes
3.4.83Steven Shavell
4.4.97Jennifer F. Reinganum
5.5.09Rafael La Porta
6.6.05Oliver D. Hart
7.7.23Ross Levine
8.7.88Michael H. Riordan
9.10.33Steven Levitt
10.10.4Timothy Bresnahan
11.12.93Marco Pagano
12.13.07Arthur Hosios
13.14.41Richard E. Just
14.14.45Simeon Djankov
15.15.57David S. Evans
16.15.96A. Mitchell Polinsky
17.17.25Pablo T. Spiller
18.18.02W Kip Viscusi

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.