RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Industrial Organization, as of January 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Industrial Organization, these are 303 authors affiliated with 759 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Industrial Organization

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IND (Industrial Organization).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.19Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
33.36CESifo, München
44.72Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
54.82Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
65.92Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
76.13Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
87.2Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
99.54Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
1010.82Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1111.05Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)12.16Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)15.46Center for Research on Employment and Economic Growth, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1115.46Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1316.64Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1418Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1518.39School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1618.52Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1718.88Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1819.22Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1919.36Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2020.11Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2123.33Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(22)25.57Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2125.57Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2328.14Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2428.41Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2528.87Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2629.84Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2730.13Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
2831.53Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2932.47Department of Finance, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
3034.87Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
3135.08Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
3235.81Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(33)37.56Financial Institutions Center, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3338.5Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
3440.92Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
3541.96Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3643.79Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
3745.14Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis

Top 5% authors in the field of Industrial Organization

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.72Timothy Bresnahan
2.1.9Sanford Jay Grossman
3.4.12Michael H. Riordan
4.4.96David Levine
5.5.02Larry H. P. Lang
6.6.63Allen N. Berger
7.7.36Margaret Emily Slade
8.7.67Joel Sobel
9.8.23Thomas Wayne Ross
10.9.64Erik Brynjolfsson
11.12.1Paul A. Geroski †
12.12.27Mamoru Kaneko
13.13.01Michael Waterson
14.13.28Charles A. Holt
15.13.34Randolph Preston McAfee

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.