RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Collective Decision-Making, as of January 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Collective Decision-Making, these are 362 authors affiliated with 736 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Collective Decision-Making

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CDM (Collective Decision-Making).
RankScoreInstitution
311National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.34Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
32.65Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
44.66Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
55.7Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
66.08London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(7)8.61Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
78.63Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research (IGIER), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
810.17CESifo, München
910.81Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1014.29Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1114.31Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1214.81Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1315.26Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
1415.37Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1415.37Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
1616.69Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1717.61Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
1817.75Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1917.92Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
2018.8Institute for International Economic Studies (IIES), Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm
2120.35Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2221.2Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
2323.27Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2423.69Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
(25)24.24International Economics Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2524.41Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
2626.03Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover
(27)26.24Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2728.16Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(28)28.23Finance Group, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
2829.09School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
(29)29.6Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2931.4Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3031.71Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3133.1World Bank Group, Washington
3237.96Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
3337.98Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca
3438.52Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing
3542.2William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3643.1European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles

Top 5% authors in the field of Collective Decision-Making

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.42Andrei Shleifer
2.2.28Alberto Alesina
3.4.39Guido Tabellini
4.5.03Elhanan Helpman
5.6.56Torsten Persson
6.6.78Sherwin Rosen †
7.8.37Daron Acemoglu
8.8.37Gene Grossman
9.9.43Xavier Sala-i-Martin
10.9.84Rafael La Porta
11.10.14Timothy J. Besley
12.11.22Avinash Kamalakar Dixit
13.12.77Steven J. Brams
14.13.05Steven Shavell
15.13.99Joel Sobel
16.14.7Herschel I. Grossman †
17.15.39John Moore
18.15.7Andrew Foster

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.