RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Central & Western Asia, as of December 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Central & Western Asia, these are 332 authors affiliated with 600 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Central & Western Asia

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CWA (Central & Western Asia).
RankScoreInstitution
11.73National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.56Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
33.61Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
43.79International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
54.69World Bank Group, Washington
64.73Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
75.25Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
86.54Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
910.44Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(10)13.48Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1014.97London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(11)15.44Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1116.25Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1216.29Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
(13)16.36Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1316.54Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1417.3Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1517.56Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad
1617.89Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
1719.25Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
(18)19.41Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(18)21.37Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
1821.78Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD), Torino
1922.75Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2025.4Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2127.57Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2232.94Economics Group, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford
(23)33.85Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(23)36.18İktisat Bölümü, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara
2236.18İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara
2437William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2537.67Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
2537.67James M. Buchanan Center for Political Economy, George Mason University, Fairfax
(25)37.67Center for the Study of Public Choice, James M. Buchanan Center for Political Economy, George Mason University, Fairfax
(27)38.71Aid Effectiveness Research, World Bank Group, Washington
(27)39.15Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP), Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(26)39.15George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2740.92Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
2841.03Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
2943.64Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge
3044.09Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Central & Western Asia

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.17David Theodore Coe
2.2.35Robert H. Topel
3.6.01Laurence Iannaccone
4.6.27Matthew Buford Canzoneri
5.6.65Robin Burgess
6.7.66Angelos Kanas
7.7.84Arvind Subramanian
8.8.5Raghbendra Jha
9.9.68Aysit Tansel
10.11.97Taye Mengistae
11.12.12Nadeem Haque
12.13.31Vijayendra Rao
13.14.59Pami Dua
14.14.64David A. Jaeger
15.14.71Timothy J. Bartik
16.15.26Marcelo Olarreaga

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.