RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Industrial Organization, as of November 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Industrial Organization, these are 305 authors affiliated with 742 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Industrial Organization

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IND (Industrial Organization).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.22Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
33.31CESifo, München
44.73Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
54.75Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
65.95Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
75.97Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
87Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
99.87Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
1010.82Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1111.06Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)12.25Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)15.45Center for Research on Employment and Economic Growth, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1115.45Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1316.35Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1417.82Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1518.03School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1619.24Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1719.33Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1819.36Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1919.76Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2020.3Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2124.04Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(22)26.64Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2126.64Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2328.83Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2429.06Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2529.3Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
2629.39Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2729.67Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2832.63Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2933.32Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
3034.21Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3134.42Department of Finance, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
3235.57Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
3335.78Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
3438.41Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
(35)38.59Financial Institutions Center, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3539.23Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
3642.25Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3743.41Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis

Top 5% authors in the field of Industrial Organization

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.81Allen N. Berger
2.2.41Sanford Jay Grossman
3.2.83Ernst Fehr
4.4.74Randolph Preston McAfee
5.4.91Bronwyn Hughes Hall
6.8.2David Levine
7.8.27Timothy Bresnahan
8.8.97Joel Sobel
9.11.82Severin Borenstein
10.12.16Mitchell Petersen
11.12.32Charles A. Holt
12.13.12Nicholas S. Economides
13.13.75Dennis W. Carlton
14.14.21Paul A. Geroski †
15.14.23Margaret Emily Slade

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.