RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Information & Communication Technologies, as of November 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Information & Communication Technologies, these are 88 authors affiliated with 310 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Information & Communication Technologies

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-ICT (Information & Communication Technologies).
RankScoreInstitution
11.62National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
21.83Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
33.81Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
45.05Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
55.72Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
65.84Economics Group, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford
(7)6.97Economics Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
78.69Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
88.91Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
99.81American Bar Foundation (ABF), Chicago
109.94Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.65Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
1214.36Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1314.67Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1314.67London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(15)16.41Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(15)16.52Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1517.34Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Top 5% authors in the field of Information & Communication Technologies

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.25Edmund S. Phelps
2.2.75Nicholas S. Economides
3.2.77Erik Brynjolfsson
4.3.58Kevin Roberts

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.