RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Central & Western Asia, as of November 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Central & Western Asia, these are 321 authors affiliated with 583 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Central & Western Asia

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CWA (Central & Western Asia).
RankScoreInstitution
11.6National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.46Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
33.24Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
44.51Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
54.81World Bank Group, Washington
65.1Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
75.25Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
86.7International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
910.18Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(10)13.67Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1014.05London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(11)15.43Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1115.75Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1216.28Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1316.81Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
1417.83Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
(15)17.95Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1518.54Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad
1618.89Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
1719Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(18)19.68Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
(18)21.02Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
1821.18Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD), Torino
1921.31Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2024.41Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2127.46Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
(22)33.71İktisat Bölümü, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara
2133.71İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara
2335.93Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
2436.55Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
2436.55James M. Buchanan Center for Political Economy, George Mason University, Fairfax
(24)36.55Center for the Study of Public Choice, James M. Buchanan Center for Political Economy, George Mason University, Fairfax
2637.15Economics Group, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford
(27)37.33Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP), Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(26)37.33George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(27)37.34Aid Effectiveness Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2739.63Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
2840.15Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(29)40.3Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2943.07Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Central & Western Asia

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.51Robert H. Topel
2.3.1Matthew Buford Canzoneri
3.4.9Arvind Subramanian
4.5.22Robin Burgess
5.6.46Nirvikar Singh
6.6.95Marcelo Olarreaga
7.7.92Timothy J. Bartik
8.8.85Ranjan Ray
9.10.12John Christopher Beghin
10.12.62David A. Jaeger
11.12.63M. Daniele Paserman
12.13.09Betty C. Daniel
13.15.17Taye Mengistae
14.15.45Poonam Gupta
15.15.94Laurence Iannaccone
16.17.29Lisa Ann Cameron

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.