RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, as of November 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, these are 475 authors affiliated with 745 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CBE (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
23.38Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
33.61Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
(4)4.69Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
45.17National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
56.76Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science (ICES), George Mason University, Fairfax
68.25Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
79.37Center for Economic Design, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul
79.37Cato Institute, Washington
99.39Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
109.87Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1111.18Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1212.04Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1313.98Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1414.99CESifo, München
1516.02Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
1617.28School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1717.81Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
1818.26Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1918.81Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2019.36Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
2121.87Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2221.94Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
(23)22.66Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2324.22School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
2424.55Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
2526.11Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
2628.35Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2729.02Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa
2830.74Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
2931.72Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3031.98Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
3132.04Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
3234.74Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3336.97Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Fairfax
3336.97Center for the Study of Neuroeconomics, George Mason University, Fairfax
(35)37.59Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
3538.9Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3639.14Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
3740.72Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Aziendali (DPTEA), Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (LUISS), Roma

Top 5% authors in the field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.2Andrew J. Oswald
2.2.41Ernst Fehr
3.2.72Bruno S. Frey
4.4.16Larry G. Epstein
5.6.49Richard R. Nelson
6.6.8Vernon L. Smith
7.7.01Klaus M. Schmidt
8.7.59James Andreoni
9.9.47Vincent P. Crawford
10.11.05Alois Stutzer
11.13.04Andrew Clark
12.14.34Simon Gächter
13.14.51J. Scott Armstrong
14.14.63Andrew Schotter
15.15.51Gary Charness
16.15.71George Loewenstein
17.16.23Armin Falk
18.18.14Daniel Friedman
19.19.57Giovanni Dosi
20.19.71Arthur Van Soest
21.19.99H. Peyton Young
22.21.49Herbert Gintis
23.23.01Robert Waldmann

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.