Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Theory and Evidence from the Czech Republic"

by Nandini Gupta & John C. Ham & Jan Svejnar

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window
  1. Klara Sabirianova & Jan Svejnar & Katherine Terrell, 2005. "Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development:Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan wp734, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  2. Jan Hanousek & Jan Bena, 2006. "Rent Extraction by Large Shareholders: Evidence Using Dividend Policy in the Czech Republic," FMG Discussion Papers, Financial Markets Group dp556, Financial Markets Group.
  3. James D. Goodnow & Pavel Vopařil, 2005. "A Classification of International Business Strategies in the Czech Republic: A Longitudinal Analysis of Selected Firms," Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2005(4), pages 331-349.
  4. Polona Domadenik & Janez Prašnikar & Jan Svejnar, 2003. "Defensive and Strategic Restructuring of Firms during the Transition to a Market Economy," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 541, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  5. Archishman Chakraborty & Nandini Gupta & Rick Harbaugh, 2000. "Best Foot Forward or Best for Last in a Sequential Auction?," Claremont Colleges Working Papers, Claremont Colleges 2000-43, Claremont Colleges.
  6. John Bennett & Saul Estrin & James Maw & Giovanni Urga, 2004. "Privatisation Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies," Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 2004.105, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  7. Jan Hanousek & Evžen Ko?enda & Jan Svejnar, 2004. "Ownership, Control and Corporate Performance After Large-Scale Privatization," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 2004-652, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  8. Gerard Rpland, 2001. "The Political Economy of Transition," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 413, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  9. De Fraja, Gianni & Roberts, Barbara M, 2007. "Privatisation in Poland: What Was the Government Trying to Achieve?," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 6114, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  10. Walsh, Patrick Paul & Whelan, Ciara, 2001. "Firm performance and the political economy of corporate governance: survey evidence for Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 85-112, June.
  11. Elisa Galeotti, 2009. "Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Geographical Proximity with Foreign Investors? Evidence from the Privatization of the Czech Glass Industry," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 026-047, March.
  12. Loren Brandt & Hongbin Li & Joanne Roberts, 2001. "Why do Governments Privatize," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 429, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  13. Jan Hanousek & Evzen Kocenda & Jan Svejnar, 2005. "Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp259, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague.
  14. Maw, James, 2002. "Partial privatization in transition economies," Economic Systems, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 271-282, September.
  15. Evzen Kocenda & Jan Svejnar, 2003. "Ownership and Firm Performance after Large-Scale Privatization," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp209, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague.
  16. Lubomír Lízal & Dietrich Earnhart, 2002. "Effects of Ownership and Financial Status on Corporate Environmental Performance," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 492, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  17. J. David Brown & John Earle & Álmos Telegdy, 2008. "Employment and Wage Effects of Privatization: Evidence from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine," CERT Discussion Papers, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University 0807, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
  18. Zuzana Fungacova, 2007. "Can the Market Fix a Wrong Administrative Decision? Massive Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp335, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague.
  19. Saul Estrin & Alan A. Bevan & Boris Kuznetsov & Mark E. Schaffer & Manuela Angelucci & Julian Fennema & Giovanni Mangiarotti, 2001. "The Determinants of Privatised Enterprise Performance in Russia," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 452, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  20. Earnhart, Dietrich & Lizal, Lubomir, 2006. "Effects of ownership and financial performance on corporate environmental performance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 111-129, March.
  21. Huyghebaert, Nancy & Quan, Qi, 2009. "Share issuing privatizations in China: Sequencing and its effects on public share allocation and underpricing," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 306-320, June.
  22. Commander, Simon & Svejnar, Jan, 2007. "Do Institutions, Ownership, Exporting and Competition Explain Firm Performance? Evidence from 26 Transition Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 2637, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  23. Jan Svejnar, 2002. "Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 3-28, Winter.
  24. Jan Svejnar & Evzen Kocenda, 2002. "The Effects of Ownership Forms and Concentration on Firm Performance after Large-Scale Privatization," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 471, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  25. Dong, Xiao-yuan & Putterman, Louis & Unel, Bulent, 2006. "Privatization and firm performance: A comparison between rural and urban enterprises in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 608-633, September.
  26. Druk-Gal, Bat-Sheva & Yaari, Varda, 2006. "Incumbent employees' resistance to implementing privatization policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 374-405, March.
  27. Richard B. Goud Jr., 2002. "Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from 25 Countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union," Development and Comp Systems 0207002, EconWPA.
  28. Fungacova, Zuzana & Hanousek, Jan, 2006. "A castle built on sand: The effects of mass privatization on stock market creation in transition economies," BOFIT Discussion Papers, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition 14/2006, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.