This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations for "The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign"

by John A. List & David Lucking-Reiley

For a complete description of this item, click here.
Cited by (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.):
  1. Daniel Rondeau & John A. List, 2008. "Matching and Challenge Gifts to Charity:Evidence from Laboratory and Natural Field Experiments," NBER Working Papers 13728, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. John List, 2008. "Introduction to field experiments in economics with applications to the economics of charity," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 203-212, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Daniel Rondeau & John List, 2008. "Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 253-267, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Heijden, E. van der & Moxnes, E., 2003. "Leading by example? Investment decisions in a mixed sequential-simultaneous public bad experiment," Discussion Paper 38, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  5. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, . "The Economics of Museums," IEW - Working Papers iewwp149, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Werner Güth & M. Vittoria Levati & Matthias Sutter & Eline van der Heijden, 2006. "Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-35, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. repec:att:wimass:1920213 is not listed on IDEAS
  8. Adriaan R. Soetevent, 2005. "Anonymity in Giving in a Natural Context-A Field Experiment in Thirty Churches," Framed Field Experiments 0066, The Field Experiments Website. [Downloadable!]
  9. Jeffrey R. Kling, 2007. "Methodological Frontiers of Public Finance Field Experiments," NBER Working Papers 12931, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Elke Renner & Martin Sefton, 2009. "Sequential versus simultaneous contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence," Discussion Papers 2009-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Emrah Arbak & Marie-Claire Villeval, 2007. "Endogenous Leadership Selection and Influence," Working Papers 0707, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique (GATE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Université Lyon 2, Ecole Normale Supérieure. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  12. Scott Barrett, 2007. "The Smallpox Eradication Game," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 179-207, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Jeffrey P. Carpenter & Glenn W. Harrison, 2005. "Field Experiments in Economics: An Introduction," Artefactual Field Experiments 0030, The Field Experiments Website. [Downloadable!]
  14. Potters, J. & Sefton, M. & Vesterlund, L., 2001. "Why announce leadership contributions? : An experimental study of the signaling and reciprocity hypotheses," Discussion Paper 100, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  15. Jonathan Meer & Harvey S. Rosen, 2009. "The ABCs of Charitable Solicitation," NBER Working Papers 15037, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. John A. List, 2002. "Testing Neoclassical Competitive Market Theory in the Field: Some Pilot Results," Framed Field Experiments 0044, The Field Experiments Website. [Downloadable!]
  17. Ronald J. Baker II & James M. Walker & Arlington W. Williams, 2006. "Matching Contributions and the Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good: Experimental Evidence," Caepr Working Papers 2006-007, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Economics Department, Indiana University Bloomington, revised Dec 2007. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  18. Michel André Maréchal & Christian Thöni, 2007. "Do Managers Reciprocate? Field Experimental Evidence From a Competitive Market," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2007 2007-09, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen. [Downloadable!]
  19. Francisco Alpizar & Fredrik Carlsson & Olof Johansson-Stenman, 2008. "Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 299-314, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  20. Claude Meidinger & Marie-Claire Villeval, 2002. "Leadership in Teams: Signaling or Reciprocating ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00178474_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
  21. David Hugh-Jones & David Reinstein, 2009. "Secret Santa: Anonymity, Signalling, and Conditional Cooperation," Economics Discussion Papers 670, University of Essex, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  22. Potters, J.J.M. & Shefton, M. & Vesterlund, L., 2003. "After you - endougenous sequencing in voluntary contribution games," Discussion Paper 98, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  23. Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2006. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence From a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 12338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  24. Baris K. Yörük, 2009. "Do Fundraisers Select Charitable Donors Based on Gender and Race? Evidence from Survey Data," Discussion Papers 09-01, University at Albany, SUNY, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  25. Yan Chen & Xin Li & Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason, 2006. "Online Fund-Raising Mechanisms: A Field Experiment," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 0(2). [Downloadable!]
  26. Stephan Meier, 2006. "Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run?: matching donations in a field experiment," Working Papers 06-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  27. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, . "Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior - Testing ‘Conditional Cooperation’ in a Field Experiment," IEW - Working Papers iewwp162, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  28. Simon Gaechter, 2006. "Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications," Discussion Papers 2006-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham. [Downloadable!]
  29. Paul Resnick & Richard Zeckhauser & John Swanson & Kate Lockwood, 2006. "The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 79-101, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  30. Bariş K. Yörük, 2006. "How Responsive are Charitable Donors to Requests to Give?," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 653, Boston College Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  31. Kentaro Hatsumi, 2009. "A Coordination Game Model of Charitable Giving and Seed Money Effect," ISER Discussion Paper 0736r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Sep 2009. [Downloadable!]
  32. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2008. "Field Experiments in Economics: The Past, The Present, and The Future," NBER Working Papers 14356, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  33. Stephan Meier & Alois Stutzer, . "Matching Donations - Subsidizing Charitable Giving in a Field Experiment," IEW - Working Papers iewwp181, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW. [Downloadable!]
  34. David Reinstein, 2007. "Substitution Between (and Motivations for) Charitable Contributions: An Experimental Study," Economics Discussion Papers 648, University of Essex, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  35. Craig E. Landry & Andreas Lange & John A. List & Michael K. Price & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2008. "Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 14319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  36. Kentaro Hatsumi, 2009. "A Coordination Game Model of Charitable Giving and Seed Money Effect," ISER Discussion Paper 0736, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University. [Downloadable!]
  37. Catherine Eckel & Philip Grossman, 2008. "Subsidizing charitable contributions: a natural field experiment comparing matching and rebate subsidies," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 234-252, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  38. Martin G. Kocher & Todd L. Cherry & Stephan Kroll & Robert J. Netzer & Matthias Sutter, 2007. "Conditional cooperation on three continents," Working Papers 2007-02, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  39. Buraschi, Andrea & Cornelli, Francesca, 2002. "Donations," CEPR Discussion Papers 3488, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-9.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.