Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud"

by Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window
  1. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Antonio Villar Notario, 2003. "The Talmud Rule And The Securement Of Agents? Awards," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  2. Rodica Branzei & Marco Dall'aglio, 2009. "Allocation rules incorporating interval uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management, vol. 2, pages 19-28.
  3. Alcalde, José & Marco_Gil, María del Carmen & Silva, José A., 2012. "The Minimal Overlap Rule: Restrictions on Mergers for Creditors' Consensus," QM&ET Working Papers 12-1, Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Teoría Económica.
  4. Andersson, Tommy & Ehlers, Lars & Svensson, Lars-Gunnar, 2012. "Least Manipulable Envy-free Rules in Economies with Indivisibilities," Working Papers 2012:8, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 30 Sep 2013.
  5. Hak-Man Kim & Tetsuo Kinoshita & Myong-Chul Shin, 2010. "A Multiagent System for Autonomous Operation of Islanded Microgrids Based on a Power Market Environment," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 3(12), pages 1972-1990, December.
  6. Barbera, Salvador & Jackson, Matthew O. & Neme, Alejandro, 1997. "Strategy-Proof Allotment Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, January.
  7. Gonzalez-Alcon, C. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2007. "A composite run-to-the-bank rule for multi-issue allocation situations," Open Access publications from Tilburg University urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-194181, Tilburg University.
  8. Moulin, Herve, 2001. "Axiomatic Cost and Surplis-Sharing," Working Papers 2001-06, Rice University, Department of Economics.
  9. Dominik Karos, 2013. "Bargaining and Power," Working Papers 2013.63, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  10. Ruben Juarez & Rajnish Kumar, 2013. "Implementing efficient graphs in connection networks," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 359-403, October.
  11. Shlomo Naeh & Uzi Segal, 2008. "The Talmud On Transitivity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 687, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 04 Sep 2009.
  12. Atlamaz, Murat & Berden, Caroline & Peters, Hans & Vermeulen, Dries, 2011. "Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 39-51, September.
  13. Balbina Casas-Mendez & Vito Fragnelli & Ignacio Garcìa-Jurado, 2014. "A survey of allocation rules for the museum pass problem," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 191-205, May.
  14. Agastya, Murali, 1999. "Perturbed Adaptive Dynamics in Coalition Form Games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 207-233, December.
  15. Lahiri Somdeb, . "Axiomatic Characterizations of the CEA Solution for Rationing Problems," IIMA Working Papers WP1999-02-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  16. Ashlagi, Itai & Karagözoğlu, Emin & Klaus, Bettina, 2012. "A non-cooperative support for equal division in estate division problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 228-233.
  17. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Osterdal, Lars Peter, 2005. "Inequality preserving rationing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 355-360, June.
  18. William Thomson, 2011. "Consistency and its converse: an introduction," Review of Economic Design, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 257-291, December.
  19. Diego Dominguez & William Thomson, 2006. "A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 283-307, 06.
  20. Borm, P.E.M. & Hamers, H.J.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2001. "Operations Research Games: A Survey," Discussion Paper 2001-45, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  21. Rene van den Brink & Yukihiko Funaki & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "The Reverse Talmud Rule for Bankruptcy Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-026/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 27 Mar 2008.
  22. Moulin, Herve, 1999. "Rationing a Commodity along Fixed Paths," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 41-72, January.
  23. Orbay, Benan Zeki & Orbay, Hakan, 2003. "Talmudic division as a cartel rule," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 167-175.
  24. Dinko Dimitrov & Stef Tijs & Rodica Branzei, 2003. "Shapley-like values for interval bankruptcy games," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(9), pages 1-8.
  25. Csóka Péter & Herings P. Jean-Jacques & Kóczy László Á. & Pintér Miklós, 2009. "Convex and Exact Games with Non-transferable Utility," Research Memorandum 031, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  26. William Thomson, 2006. "The Two-Agent Claims-Truncated Proportional Rule Has No Consistent Extension: A Constructive Proof," RCER Working Papers 529, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  27. Killion, M. Ulric, 2009. "Relation of game theory to economic history and marginalism," MPRA Paper 13378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  28. Iñigo Iturbe-Ormaetxe Kortajarene & Luis Corchón, 1997. "A proposal to unify some concepts in the theory of fairness," Working Papers. Serie AD 1997-21, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  29. Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Borm, P.E.M. & Timmer, J.B., 2000. "On Convexity for NTU-Games," Discussion Paper 2000-108, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  30. Miguel Hinojosa & Amparo Mármol, 2014. "Multi-commodity rationing problems with maxmin payoffs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 353-370, June.
  31. Lorenzo-Freire, S. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2005. "The Two-stage Constrained Equal Awards and Losses Rules for Multi-Issue Allocation Situation," Discussion Paper 2005-80, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  32. Takumi Kato & Hideyuki Takahashi & Kazuto Sasai & Gen Kitagata & Hak-Man Kim & Tetsuo Kinoshita, 2014. "Priority-Based Hierarchical Operational Management for Multiagent-Based Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 7(4), pages 2051-2078, March.
  33. Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Peris, Josep E., 2014. "A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 109-116.
  34. Suchan Chae & Hervé Moulin, 2010. "Bargaining among groups: an axiomatic viewpoint," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 71-88, March.
  35. Voorneveld, Mark, 2003. "Probabilistic choice in games: properties of Rosenthal's t-solutions," Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 542, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 31 Oct 2003.
  36. Karagözoğlu Emin, 2010. "A Noncooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  37. O. Tejada and M. Alvarez-Mozos, 2012. "Vertical Syndication-Proof Competitive Prices in Multilateral Markets," Working Papers in Economics 283, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
  38. Nejat Anbarci, 2008. "Relative Responsiveness of Bargaining Solutions to Changes in Status-quo Payoffs," Atlantic Economic Journal, International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 36(3), pages 293-299, September.
  39. Birendra K. Rai, 2006. "Evolution of Division Rules," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-27, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
  40. Tijs, Stef & Borm, Peter & Lohmann, Edwin & Quant, Marieke, 2011. "An average lexicographic value for cooperative games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 210-220, August.
  41. Rodica Branzei & Sirma Zeynep Alparslan Gok, 2008. "Bankruptcy problems with interval uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(56), pages 1-10.
  42. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2005. "Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra’s proposal," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 103-114, 07.
  43. van den Brink, René & Funaki, Yukihiko & van der Laan, Gerard, 2013. "Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by Exemption and Exclusion properties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 413-417.
  44. Stéphane Gonzalez & Michel Grabisch, 2012. "Preserving coalitional rationality for non-balanced games," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00718358, HAL.
  45. Endre Bjørndal & Kurt Jörnsten, 2010. "Flow sharing and bankruptcy games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 11-28, March.
  46. Huijink, S. & Borm, P.E.M. & Reijnierse, J.H. & Kleppe, J., 2013. "Bankruptcy and the Per Capita Nucleolus," Discussion Paper 2013-059, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  47. Moulin, Herve & Shenker, Scott, 1999. "Distributive and Additive Costsharing of an Homogeneous Good," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 299-330, May.
  48. Carmen Herrero, 2000. "The Three Musketeers. Old Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0609, Econometric Society.
  49. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2012. "A new analysis of a simple model of fair allocation," Working Papers 12.10, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  50. Gura Ein-Ya, 2005. "Using Game Theory to Increase Students' Motivation to Learn Mathematics," Discussion Paper Series dp384, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  51. William Thomson, 2007. "Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 538, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  52. Simon G�chter & Arno Riedl, 2004. "Dividing justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-044/1, Tinbergen Institute.
  53. Serrano, Roberto, 1995. "Strategic bargaining, surplus sharing problems and the nucleolus," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 319-329.
  54. Hokari, Toru & Thomson, William, 2008. "On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(11), pages 1057-1071, December.
  55. Luisa Carpente & Balbina Casas-Méndez & Javier Gozálvez & Natividad Llorca & Manuel Pulido & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2013. "How to divide a cake when people have different metabolism?," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 361-371, December.
  56. Bergantinos, Gustavo & Vidal-Puga, Juan J., 2004. "Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 87-101, January.
  57. S. Nuray Akin & Murat R. Sertel, 2007. "The Kalai-Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution Manipulated by Pre-Donations is Concessionary," Working Papers 0718, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
  58. Jens L. Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars P. Osterdal, 2012. "Rationing in the presence of baselines," Working Papers 12.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  59. Chun, Youngsub, 2006. "A pessimistic approach to the queueing problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 171-181, March.
  60. Diego Dominguez, 2007. "Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Working Papers 0705, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
  61. Caprari, E. & Patrone, F. & Pusillo, L. & Tijs, S.H. & Torre, A., 2006. "Share Opportunity Sets and Cooperative Games," Discussion Paper 2006-115, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  62. Yoichi Kasajima & Rodrigo Velez, 2011. "Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 283-295, February.
  63. Diego Dominguez, 2013. "Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 663-678, March.
  64. Helga Habis & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2012. "Stochastic Bankruptcy Games," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1205, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  65. Driessen, Theo S.H. & Fragnelli, Vito & Katsev, Ilya V. & Khmelnitskaya, Anna B., 2011. "On 1-convexity and nucleolus of co-insurance games," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 217-225, March.
  66. Ju, Biung-Ghi & Miyagawa, Eiichi & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-26, January.
  67. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., . "Voting over piece-wise linear tax methods," CORE Discussion Papers RP -2298, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  68. Youngsub Chun & William Thomson, 2004. "Convergence under Replication of Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 512, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  69. Richard Startz & Kwok Ping Tsang, 2014. "On the Present Value Model in a Cross Section of Stocks," Working Papers e07-47, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Economics.
  70. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1997. "A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Economic theory and game theory 005, Nir Dagan.
  71. Erik Ansink & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2009. "Sequential Sharing Rules for River Sharing Problems," Working Papers 2009.114, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  72. Kaminski, Marek M., 2000. "'Hydraulic' rationing," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 131-155, September.
  73. Kristof Bosmans & Erik Schokkaert, 2009. "Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 533-557, November.
  74. Roberto Serrano, 2005. "Fifty years of the Nash program, 1953-2003," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 29(2), pages 219-258, May.
  75. Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2006. "Protective Properties and the Constrained Equal Awards Rule for Claims Problems: A Note," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 221-230, October.
  76. José M. Jiménez Gómez & María del Carmen Marco, 2008. "A New Approach for Bounding Awards in Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  77. Özgür Kıbrıs, 2013. "On recursive solutions to simple allocation problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 449-463, September.
  78. William Thomson, 2006. "On the Existence of Consistent Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims: A Constructive Geometric Approach," RCER Working Papers 528, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  79. van den Nouweland, A. & Wooders, M.H., 2001. "Axiomatization of Ratio Equilibria in Public Good Economies," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 585, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  80. Suchan Chae & Paul Heidhues, 2001. "Nash Bargaining Solution with Coalitions and The Joint Bargaining Paradox," CIG Working Papers FS IV 01-15, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
  81. Abraham Diskin & Dan Felsenthal, 2007. "Individual rationality and bargaining," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 25-29, October.
  82. Youngsub Chun & Junghoon Lee, 2007. "On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 259-273, October.
  83. Jens L. Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars P. Østerdal, 2011. "A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims," Discussion Papers 11-03, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  84. Elvio Accinelli & Leobardo Plata & Joss Sánchez, 2011. "Characterization of solutions for bankruptcy problems," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1911, Department of Economics - dECON.
  85. De MESNARD, Louis, 2008. "On the Talmud division : equity and robustness," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2008-07, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
  86. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & VILLAR, Antonio, . "New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule," CORE Discussion Papers RP -1926, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  87. William Thomson, 2006. "A Characterization of a Family of Rules for the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 530, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  88. Michel Balinski & Gabrielle Demange, 1989. "An Axiomatic Approach to Proportionality between Matrices," Post-Print hal-00686748, HAL.
  89. Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society.
  90. Moretti, S. & Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Connection Situations under Uncertainty," Discussion Paper 2008-64, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  91. William Thomson, 2007. "Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 535, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  92. Brânzei, R. & Dall'Aglio, M. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Interval Game Theoretic Division Rules," Discussion Paper 2008-97, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  93. Kóczy Á., László, 2006. "A Neumann-féle játékelmélet
    [Neumanns game theory]
    ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 31-45.
  94. Flip Klijn & Stef Tijs & Marco Slikker, 2001. "A Dual Egalitarian Solution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8.
  95. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1999. "Feasible Implementation of Taxation Methods," Economic theory and game theory 009, Nir Dagan.
  96. Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R., 2004. "Cases in Cooperation and Cutting the Cake," Discussion Paper 2004-108, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  97. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., . "Composition, securement, and concede-and-divide," CORE Discussion Papers RP -1895, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  98. repec:dgr:kubcen:2013078 is not listed on IDEAS
  99. Biung-Ghi Ju & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2006. "Progressivity, Inequality Reduction, and Merging-Proofness in Taxation," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 200603, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2006.
  100. Jayaraj, D. & Subramanian, S., 2012. "On the .Inclusiveness. of India.s Consumption Expenditure Growth," Working Paper Series UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  101. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:56:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
  102. Habis Helga & Herings P. Jean-Jacques, 2010. "Transferable Utility Games with Uncertainty," Research Memorandum 038, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  103. Brânzei, R. & Ferrari, G. & Fragnelli, V. & Tijs, S.H., 2001. "Two Approaches to the Problem of Sharing Delay Costs in Joint Projects," Discussion Paper 2001-22, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  104. Alcalde, José & Marco-Gil, María del Carmen & Silva-Reus, José A., 2012. "Tax Burden Degree as a Tool to Design Tax Systems," QM&ET Working Papers 12-11, Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Teoría Económica.
  105. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2002. "Sustainability in bankruptcy problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 261-273, December.
  106. Youngsub Chun & Boram Park, 2012. "Population solidarity, population fair-ranking, and the egalitarian value," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 255-270, May.
  107. Nir Dagan, 1996. "New Characterizations of Old Bankruptcy Rules," Economic theory and game theory 002, Nir Dagan.
  108. Eric Bahel, 2014. "On the core and bargaining set of a veto game," Working Papers e07-48, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Economics.
  109. Txus Ortells & Juan Santos, 2011. "The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 55-73, February.
  110. Hamers, Herbert, 1997. "On the concavity of delivery games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 445-458, June.
  111. Rhee, Sangkyu, 2006. "Allocation problems among sharing groups," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 398-418, February.
  112. Erlanson, Albin & Szwagrzak, Karol, 2013. "Strategy-Proof Package Assignment," Working Papers 2013:43, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  113. Quant, Marieke & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud & Zwikker, Peter, 2006. "Compromise solutions based on bankruptcy," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 247-256, May.
  114. Peris, Josep E. & Jiménez-Gómez, José M., 2012. "A Proportional Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with a guaranteed minimum," QM&ET Working Papers 12-7, Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Teoría Económica.
  115. Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2004. "Sustainability, exemption, and the constrained equal awards rule: a note," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 103-110, January.
  116. Marianne Lefebvre, 2011. "Sharing Rules for Common-Pool Resources when Self-insurance is Available: an Experiment," Working Papers 11-22, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Jun 2012.
  117. Hinojosa, M.A. & Romero, E. & Zarzuelo, J.M., 2012. "Consistency of the Harsanyi NTU configuration value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 665-677.
  118. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco & Michael Maschler, 1996. "Individual rights and collective responsibility: The rights-egalitarian solution," Working Papers. Serie AD 1996-04, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  119. Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2008. "Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(9-10), pages 925-932, September.
  120. M. Josune Albizuri & Justin Leroux & José Manuel Zarzuelo, 2008. "Updating Claims in Bankruptcy Problems," Cahiers de recherche 08-08, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
  121. Alexander Karpov & Semyon Yurkov, 2012. "Generalized bankruptcy problem," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/FE/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  122. William Thomson, 2013. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update," RCER Working Papers 578, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  123. A. Estévez-Fernández & M. Fiestras-Janeiro & M. Mosquera & E. Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2012. "A bankruptcy approach to the core cover," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 343-359, December.
  124. Guni Orshan & Peter Sudhölter, 2012. "Nonsymmetric variants of the prekernel and the prenucleolus," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 809-828, November.
  125. Yevgeni Berzak & Michael Fink, 2008. "Manipulating Allocation Justice: How Framing Effects can Increase the Prevalence of the Talmudic Division Principle "Shnaim Ohazin"," Discussion Paper Series dp479, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  126. Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Osório Costa, Antonio Miguel & Peris, Josep E., 2013. "From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach," Working Papers 2072/212193, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
  127. Tommy Andersson & Lars Ehlers & Lars-Gunnar Svensson, 2012. "(Minimally) ?-Incentive Compatible Competitive Equilibria in Economies with Indivisibilities," Cahiers de recherche 04-2012, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
  128. Jin Li & Jingyi Xue, 2013. "Egalitarian division under Leontief Preferences," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 597-622, November.
  129. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2008. "The minimal overlap rule revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 109-128, June.
  130. Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Convex Interval Games," Discussion Paper 2008-37, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  131. Stef Tijs & Gert-Jan Otten, 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-36, December.
  132. Chambers, Christopher P., 2006. "Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 241-260, February.
  133. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Measuring and rewarding flexibility in collaborative distribution, including two-partner coalitions," Working Papers 2013017, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  134. Chambers, Christopher P. & Thomson, William, 2002. "Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 235-252, December.
  135. Nir Dagan, 2008. "An axiomatization of the leveling tax-transfer policy," Economic theory and game theory 020, Nir Dagan.
  136. Slikker, M. & Norde, H.W., 2008. "The Monoclus of a Coalitional Game," Discussion Paper 2008-6, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  137. René Brink & Yukihiko Funaki, 2009. "Axiomatizations of a Class of Equal Surplus Sharing Solutions for TU-Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 303-340, September.
  138. Harmgart, H. & Huck, S. & Müller, W., 2006. "The Miracle as Randomization Device: A Lesson from Richard Wagner's Romantic Opera Tannhauser und der Sangerkrieg auf Wartburg," Discussion Paper 2006-006, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
  139. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 231-249, October.
  140. Thierry Marchant, 2008. "Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 693-707, December.
  141. Kleppe, John & Reijnierse, Hans & Sudhölter, Peter, 2013. "Axiomatizations of symmetrically weighted solutions," Discussion Papers of Business and Economics 3/2013, Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark.
  142. Yan-an Hwang & Tsung-fu Wang, 2009. "Population monotonicity, consistency and the random arrival rule," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(4), pages 2816-2821.
  143. Voorneveld, M. & Grahn, S., 2001. "A Minimal Test for Convex Games and the Shapley Value," Papers 2001:02, Uppsala - Working Paper Series.
  144. Stovall, John, 2014. "Collective Rationality and Monotone Path Division Rules," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1035, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  145. Karagozoglu, Emin, 2008. "A Noncooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memorandum 031, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  146. Barry Feldman, 2005. "Lost in Translation? Basis Utility and Proportionality in Games," Game Theory and Information 0507001, EconWPA, revised 06 Jul 2005.
  147. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & VERCRUYSSE, Dries & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Analysis of different cost allocation methods in a collaborative transport setting," Working Papers 2013009, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  148. Thomson, William & Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2008. "Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 177-198, November.
  149. Hervé Moulin, 2002. "The proportional random allocation of indivisible units," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 381-413.
  150. Soesja Grundel & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers, 2013. "Resource allocation games: a compromise stable extension of bankruptcy games," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 149-169, October.
  151. Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.
  152. Rodica Branzei & Marco Dall'Aglio & Stef H. Tijs, 2013. "On Bankruptcy Game Theoretic Interval Rules," Papers 1301.3096, arXiv.org.
  153. Marieke Quant & Peter Borm, 2011. "Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 249-266, February.
  154. Pere Timoner & Josep Maria Izquierdo, 2014. "Rationing problems with payoff thresholds," UB Economics Working Papers 2014/311, Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat d'Economia i Empresa, UB Economics.
  155. Murali Agastia, . "Adaptive Play in Multiplayer Bargaining Situations," ELSE working papers 007, ESRC Centre on Economics Learning and Social Evolution.
  156. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Antonio Villar Notario, 2002. "Bankruptcy Rules And Progressive Taxation," Working Papers. Serie AD 2002-15, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  157. Chae, Suchan & Heidhues, Paul, 2004. "A group bargaining solution," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-53, July.
  158. Viswanath, P. V., 2000. "Risk sharing, diversification and moral hazard in Roman Palestine evidence from agricultural contract law," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 353-369, September.
  159. Einy, Ezra & Holzman, Ron & Monderer, Dov & Shitovitz, Benyamin, 1997. "Core Equivalence Theorems for Infinite Convex Games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 1-12, September.
  160. S. Alparslan-Gök & Silvia Miquel & Stef Tijs, 2009. "Cooperation under interval uncertainty," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 99-109, March.
  161. Koster, M., 2005. "Sharing Variable Returns of Cooperation," CeNDEF Working Papers 05-06, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.
  162. Calleja, Pedro & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2005. "Multi-issue allocation situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 730-747, August.
  163. Andreas Orland & Michael W.M. Roos, 2013. "Unstructured Bargaining over an Endogenously Produced Surplus and Fairness Ideals – An Experiment," Ruhr Economic Papers 0439, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
  164. Arin, Javier & Inarra, Elena, 1998. "A Characterization of the Nucleolus for Convex Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 12-24, April.
  165. Peter Knudsen & Lars Østerdal, 2012. "Merging and splitting in cooperative games: some (im)possibility results," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 763-774, November.
  166. Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Teixidó Figueras, Jordi Josep & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2014. "The global carbon budget:a conflicting claims problem," Working Papers 2072/237597, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
  167. Rebelo, S., 1997. "On the Determinant of Economic Growth," RCER Working Papers 443, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  168. Nejat Anbarci, 2003. "Relative Disagreement-Point Monotonicity of Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 0302, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
  169. Abraham Diskin & Dan S. Felsenthal, 2007. "Individual rationality and bargaining," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24233, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  170. Kuipers, Jeroen & Vermeulen, Dries & Voorneveld, Mark, 2009. "A generalization of the Shapley-Ichiishi result," Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 711, Stockholm School of Economics.
  171. Peris, Josep E. & Jiménez-Gómez, José M., 2012. "Solidarity and uniform rules in bankruptcy problems," QM&ET Working Papers 12-8, Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Teoría Económica.
  172. Joan Esteban & Jozsef Sakovics, 2004. "Why do lions get the lion's share? A Hobbesian theory of agreements," ESE Discussion Papers 37, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
  173. Rene van den Brink & Yukihiko Funaki & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "The Reverse Talmud Rule for Bankruptcy Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-026/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 27 Mar 2008.
  174. Esa Mangeloja, 2004. "Economic utopia of the Torah. Economic concepts of the Hebrew Bible interpreted according to the Rabbinical Literature," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0405004, EconWPA.
  175. Thomson, William, 2013. "A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 157-168.
  176. Ansink, Erik, 2011. "The Arctic scramble: Introducing claims in a contest model," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 693-707.
  177. Jens L. Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars P. Østerdal, 2011. "Baseline Rationing," Working Papers 2011-04, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
  178. M. Hinojosa & A. Mármol & F. Sánchez, 2012. "A consistent talmudic rule for division problems with multiple references," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 661-678, October.
  179. Leobardo Plata-Perez & Joss Sanchez-Perez, 2011. "Convexity and marginal contributions in bankruptcy games," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Negocios, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 8(1), pages 61-72, Julio-Dic.
  180. Calleja, P. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2001. "Multi-Issue Allocation Games," Discussion Paper 2001-30, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  181. M. Nakayama, 1988. "A Strategic Form for a Convex Game," Discussion Papers 765, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  182. Moulin, Herve, 2001. "Filling a Multicolor Urn: An Axiomatic Analysis," Working Papers 2001-01, Rice University, Department of Economics.
  183. Bergantinos, Gustavo & Sanchez, Estela, 2002. "The proportional rule for problems with constraints and claims," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 225-249, March.
  184. Hinojosa, M. A. & Marmol, A. M. & Thomas, L. C., 2005. "Core, least core and nucleolus for multiple scenario cooperative games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 225-238, July.
  185. Grahn,Sofia & Kuijpers,Jeroen & Vermeulen,Dries & Voorneveld,Mark, 2003. "A Generalization Of The Shapley-Ichiishi Result And Its Application To Convex Games," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  186. Biró, Péter, 2011. "A társadalmi döntések számítástudománya - egy új határterület. European Future Technologies Conference and Exhibition (FET'11) COMSOC (Computational Social Choice) szekció MTA Közgazdaság," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 709-715.
  187. Kaminski, Marek M., 2006. "Parametric rationing methods," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 115-133, January.
  188. Benoit, Jean-Pierre, 1997. "The Nucleolus Is Contested-Garment-Consistent: A Direct Proof," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 192-196, November.
  189. Pálvölgyi Dénes & Peters Hans & Vermeulen Dries, 2010. "A strategic approach to estate division problems with non-homogenous preferences," Research Memorandum 036, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  190. Farmer, Amy & Tiefenthaler, Jill, 1995. "Fairness concepts and the intrahousehold allocation of resources," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 179-189, August.
  191. Marco Mariotti, 2003. "Even Allocations For Generalised Rationing Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-10, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  192. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 2000. "The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions To Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  193. Habis, Helga, 2012. "Sztochasztikus csődjátékok - avagy hogyan osszunk szét egy bizonytalan méretű tortát?
    [Stochastic bankruptcy games. How can a cake of uncertain dimensions be divided?]
    ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1299-1310.
  194. Kıbrıs, Özgür & Kıbrıs, Arzu, 2013. "On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 85-99.
  195. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Carmen Herrero Blanco & Giovanni Ponti, 2003. "An Experiment On Bankruptcy," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-03, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  196. Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel, 2011. "A way to play bankruptcy problems," Working Papers 2072/169781, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
  197. Jerry Green, 2005. "Compensatory transfers in two-player decision problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 159-180, 06.
  198. Moulin, Herve & Stong, Richard, 2001. "Fair Queuing and Other Probabilistic Allocation Methods," Working Papers 2000-09, Rice University, Department of Economics.
  199. Tijs, S.H. & Koster, M.A.L., 1996. "General Aggregation of Demand and Cost Sharing Methods," Discussion Paper 1996-87, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  200. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 1998. "- Preeminence And Sustainability In Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-17, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  201. José Alcalde & María Carmen Marco-Gil & José Silva-Reus, 2014. "The minimal overlap rule: restrictions on mergers for creditors’ consensus," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 363-383, April.
  202. Roland Luttens, 2010. "Minimal rights based solidarity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 47-64, January.
  203. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & CUERVO, Daniel Palhazi & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Estimating collaborative profits under varying partner characteristics and strategies," Working Papers 2013031, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
  204. R.I. Luttens, 2006. "Minimal rights based solidarity," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/356, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  205. Arantza Est�vez-Fern�ndez & Mar�a Gloria Fiestras-Janeiro & Manuel Alfredo Mosquera & Estela S�nchez- Rodr�guez, 2012. "A Bankruptcy Approach to the Core Cover," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-012/1, Tinbergen Institute.
  206. Alcalde, Jose & Marco-Gil, María del Carmen & Silva, José A., 2010. "Merging and Going Bankrupt: A Neutral Solution," MPRA Paper 28339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  207. Kasajima, Yoichi & Velez, Rodrigo A., 2010. "Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1079-1092, November.
  208. Carmen Bevia, 1996. "Identical preferences lower bound solution and consistency in economies with indivisible goods," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-126, January.