Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?"

by Cameron, Trudy Ann & Poe, Gregory L. & Ethier, Robert G. & Schulze, William D.

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window
  1. Schlapfer, Felix, 2006. "Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 415-429, May.
  2. Lindhjem, Henrik, 2006. "20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis," MPRA Paper 11467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Aadland, David & Caplan, Arthur J., 2006. "Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 562-578, August.
  4. Kataria, Mitesh, 2009. "Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 69-76, January.
  5. Alpizar, Francisco & Carlsson, Fredrik & Martinsson, Peter, 2001. "Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation," Working Papers in Economics, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics 52, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
  6. Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2004. "What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), September.
  7. V. Smith & Subhrendu Pattanayak, 2002. "Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 271-296, June.
  8. Azucena Gracia, 2014. "Consumers’ preferences for a local food product: a real choice experiment," Empirical Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 111-128, August.
  9. Siikamaki, Juha & Layton, David F., 2001. "Logit Models For Pooled Contingent Valuation And Contingent Rating And Ranking Data: Valuing Benefits From Forest Biodiversity Conservation," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) 20616, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  10. Fernando San Miguel & Mandy Ryan & Mabelle Amaya-Amaya, 2005. "'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 307-322.
  11. Gillespie, Robert & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2011. "Willingness to pay for recycling food waste in the Brisbane Region," Research Reports, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub 107804, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
  12. Hui Li & R. P. Berrens & A. K. Bohara & H. C. Jenkins-Smith & C. L. Silva & L. Weimer, 2004. "Telephone versus Internet samples for a national advisory referendum: are the underlying stated preferences the same?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 173-176.
  13. Bennett, Michael & Provencher, Bill & Bishop, Richard, 2004. "Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives," Staff Paper Series, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics 468, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  14. Michael P. Keane & Nada Wasi, 2013. "The Structure of Consumer Taste Heterogeneity in Revealed vs. Stated Preference Data," Economics Papers, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford 2013-W10, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
  15. Thijs Dekker & Paul Koster & Roy Brouwer, 2013. "Changing with the Tide: Semi-Parametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Tinbergen Institute 13-074/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  16. Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Stale, 2011. "Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes," MPRA Paper 35633, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  17. Conlon, B.J. & Dellaert, B.G.C. & Soest, A.H.O. van, 2000. "Combining and Comparing Consumers' Stated Preference Ratings and Choice Responses," Discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research 2000-119, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  18. Gillespie, Robert & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2010. "Non Use Economic Values of Marine Protected Areas in the South-West Marine Region," Research Reports, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub 107582, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
  19. Saelensminde, Kjartan, 2006. "Causes and consequences of lexicographic choices in stated choice studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 331-340, September.
  20. McNair, Ben J. & Bennett, Jeff & Hensher, David A., 2010. "A comparison of responses to single and repeated discrete choice questions," MPRA Paper 23163, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  21. Felix Schlaepfer, 2007. "Contingent valuation: a new perspective," SOI - Working Papers, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich 0715, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich.
  22. Poe, Gregory L. & Vossler, Christian A., 2009. "Consequentiality and contingent values: an emerging paradigm," MPRA Paper 38864, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  23. Hui Li & David L. Weimer & Hank C. Jenkins-Smith Carol L. Silva & Robert P. Berrens Alok K. Bohara, 2005. "Exploring the Beta Model Using Proportional Budget Information in a Contingent Valuation Study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9.
  24. Daniel Burghart & Trudy Cameron & Geoffrey Gerdes, 2007. "Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: Risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 77-105, August.
  25. Shrestha, Ram K. & Alavalapati, Janaki R. R., 2004. "Valuing environmental benefits of silvopasture practice: a case study of the Lake Okeechobee watershed in Florida," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 349-359, July.
  26. Hiselius, Lena Winslott, 2005. "Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?," Working Papers, Lund University, Department of Economics 2005:30, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  27. Bartczak, Anna & Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle & Zandersen, Marianne & Zylicz, Tomasz, 2008. "Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 10(7-8), pages 467-472, October.
  28. Willmarth, Blake & Turner, Robert, 2010. "Respondent Consistency in a Tournament-Style Contingent Choice Survey," Working Papers, Department of Economics, Colgate University 2010-05, Department of Economics, Colgate University.
  29. Eriksson, Stefan & Johansson, Per & Langenskiöld, Sophie, 2012. "What is the right profile for getting a job? A stated choice experiment of the recruitment process," Working Paper Series, Center for Labor Studies, Uppsala University, Department of Economics 2012:16, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
  30. Wiktor Adamowicz & David Bunch & Trudy Cameron & Benedict Dellaert & Michael Hanneman & Michael Keane & Jordan Louviere & Robert Meyer & Thomas Steenburgh & Joffre Swait, 2008. "Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling," Marketing Letters, Springer, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 215-228, December.
  31. Robert Gillespie & Jeff Bennett, 2011. "Non Use Economic Values of Marine Protected Areas in the South-West Marine Area," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University 10103, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  32. Vossler, Christian A., 2003. "Multiple bounded discrete choice contingent valuation: parametric and nonparametric welfare estimation and a comparison to the payment card," MPRA Paper 38867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  33. Carlsson, Fredrik & Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2006. "Should We Trust Hypothetical Referenda? Test and Identification Problems," Working Papers in Economics, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics 189, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised 24 Jan 2006.
  34. Hensher, David A., 2010. "Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 735-752, July.
  35. Xie, Jing & Gao, Zhifeng, 2013. "The Comparison of three Non-hypothetical Valuation Methods: Choice Experiments, Contingent Valuation, and Experimental Auction," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida, Southern Agricultural Economics Association 143103, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  36. Siikamaki, Juha & Layton, David F., 2006. "Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models," Discussion Papers, Resources For the Future dp-05-60, Resources For the Future.
  37. Cameron, Trudy Ann, 2005. "Individual option prices for climate change mitigation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 283-301, February.
  38. Carlsson, Fredrik & Frykblom, Peter & Lagerkvist, Carl Johan, 2004. "Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs," Working Papers in Economics, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics 149, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
  39. Carlsson, Fredrik & Frykblom, Peter & Johan Lagerkvist, Carl, 2005. "Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 147-152, November.
  40. Morrison, Mark & Bergland, Olvar, 2006. "Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 420-428, December.
  41. Jürgen Meyerhoff & Morten Mørkbak & Søren Olsen, 2014. "A Meta-study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference Surveys," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 58(1), pages 35-57, May.
  42. Emmanouil Mentzakis & Jingjing Zhang, 2012. "An investigation of individual preferences: consistency across incentives and stability over time," ECON - Working Papers, Department of Economics - University of Zurich 070, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  43. repec:dgr:uvatin:2013074 is not listed on IDEAS
  44. Aoki, Keiko & Shen, Junyi & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, 2010. "Consumer reaction to information on food additives: Evidence from an eating experiment and a field survey," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 433-438, March.
  45. J. DeShazo & Trudy Cameron & Manrique Saenz, 2009. "The Effect of Consumers’ Real-World Choice Sets on Inferences from Stated Preference Surveys," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(3), pages 319-343, March.
  46. Mandy Ryan & Mabelle Amaya-Amaya, 2005. "' Threats ' to and hopes for estimating benefits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 609-619.
  47. Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Svedsäter, Henrik, 2012. "Self-image and valuation of moral goods: Stated versus actual willingness to pay," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 879-891.
  48. Wiktor Adamowicz & J. Deshazo, 2006. "Frontiers in Stated Preferences Methods: An Introduction," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(1), pages 1-6, 05.
  49. Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Svedsäter, Henrik, 2007. "Hypothetical bias in choice experiments: Within versus between subject tests," Working Papers in Economics, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics 252, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
  50. Tran Tuan & Stale Navrud, 2007. "Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(1), pages 51-69, September.
  51. Wang, Hua & Fang, Ke & Shi, Yuyan, 2010. "Economic valuation of development projects : a case study of a non-motorized transport project in India," Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank 5422, The World Bank.
  52. Xie, Jing & Gao, Zhifeng & House, Lisa, 2013. "Purchase Intention Effects in Experimental Auctions and Real Choice Experiments," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C., Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 151595, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  53. Carlsson, Fredrik & Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2010. "Scale factors and hypothetical referenda: A clarifying note," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 286-292, May.
  54. Christopher Azevedo & John R. Crooker, 2008. "Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models," Working Papers, University of Central Missouri, Department of Economics & Finance 0803, University of Central Missouri, Department of Economics & Finance, revised May 2008.
  55. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:8:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
  56. Frédéric Roy-Vigneault & Daniel Rondeau & Maurice Doyon & Christian A. Vossler, 2010. "Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments," CIRANO Working Papers, CIRANO 2010s-43, CIRANO.
  57. Jordan Louviere & Kenneth Train & Moshe Ben-Akiva & Chandra Bhat & David Brownstone & Trudy Cameron & Richard Carson & J. Deshazo & Denzil Fiebig & William Greene & David Hensher & Donald Waldman, 2005. "Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling," Marketing Letters, Springer, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 255-265, December.
  58. Siikamaki, Juha & Layton, David F., 2007. "Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 122-139, January.
  59. Vossler, Christian A. & Kerkvliet, Joe & Polasky, Stephen & Gainutdinova, Olesya, 2003. "Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 261-277, June.
  60. Scott J. Savage & Donald M. Waldman, 2008. "Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 351-371.
  61. Nagy, Benedek, 2012. "A repülőtéri zsúfoltságkezelési módszerek hatékonysága
    [The efficiency of methods to treat crowding in airports]
    ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 74-91.
  62. Vossler, Christian A. & Kerkvliet, Joe, 2003. "A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 631-649, May.
  63. Boman, Mattias, 2009. "To pay or not to pay for biodiversity in forests - What scale determines responses to willingness to pay questions with uncertain response options?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 79-91, January.
  64. Brey, Raul & Bergland, Olvar & Riera, Pere, 2011. "A contingent grouping approach for stated preferences," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 745-755, September.
  65. Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Svedsäter, Henrik, 2011. "Self-Image and Valuation of Moral Goods: Stated versus Real Willingness to Pay," Working Papers in Economics, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics 484, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.