This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations for "Spatial Equilibrium with Entry"

by Palfrey, Thomas R

For a complete description of this item, click here.
Cited by (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.):
  1. Matias Iaryczower & Andrea Mattozzi, 2008. "Ideology and Competence in Alternative Electoral Systems," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000002387, David K. Levine. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Zakharov Alexei, 2005. "Candidate location and endogenous valence," EERC Working Paper Series 05-17e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS. [Downloadable!]
  3. Callander, Steven, 1999. "Electoral Competition with Entry," Working Papers 1083, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  4. Ordeshook, Peter C., 1991. "The Development of Contemporary Political Theory," Working Papers 762, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  5. Xefteris, Dimitrios & Matakos, Kostas, 2009. "Endogenous Choice of Electoral Rules in a Multi-party System with Two Dominant Parties," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 917, University of Warwick, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  6. Georges Casamatta & Philippe Donder, 2005. "On the influence of extreme parties in electoral competition with policy-motivated candidates," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-29, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Evan Osborne, 1998. "A theory of gridlock: Strategic behavior in legislative deliberations," Atlantic Economic Journal, International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 238-251, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Micael Castanheira, . "Why Vote for Losers?," Working Papers 125, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Alberto Alesina & Howard Rosenthal, 1989. "Moderating Elections," NBER Working Papers 3072, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Richard Chisik & Robert Lemke, 2006. "When winning is the only thing: pure strategy Nash equilibria in a three-candidate spatial voting model," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 209-215, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  11. Juan Carlos Berganza, 2000. "Politicians, voters and electoral processes: an overview," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 24(3), pages 501-543, September. [Downloadable!]
  12. Alessandro Lizzeri, 2000. "The Drawbacks of Electoral Competition," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0898, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  13. Steve Alpern & Diane Reyniers, 2002. "Spatial Dispersion as a Dynamic Coordination Problem," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 29-59, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Ron Shachar, 2003. "Party loyalty as habit formation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 251-269. [Downloadable!]
  15. John Duggan & Yoji Sekiya, 2008. "Voting Equilibria in Multi-candidate Elections," Wallis Working Papers WP52, University of Rochester - Wallis Institute of Political Economy. [Downloadable!]
  16. Cecilia Testa, 2004. "Party Polarization and Electoral Accountability," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 130, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
  17. Dubin, Jeffrey A. & Kiewiet, Roderick D. & Noussair, Charles N., 1991. "Voting on Growth Control Measures: Preferences and Strategies," Working Papers 777, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  18. Martin J. Osborne & Al Slivinksi, 1995. "A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates," Department of Economics Working Papers 1995-01, McMaster University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  19. Blume, Andreas & DeJong, Douglas V. & Maier, Michael, 2005. "Cognition in spatial dispersion games," Discussion Paper 58, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  20. Kwang-ho Kim, 2005. "Valence characteristics and entry of a third party," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 4(18), pages 1-9. [Downloadable!]
  21. Anouk Riviere, 2003. "Moderation in Proportional Systems: Coalitions Matter," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 03/7, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Dec 2003. [Downloadable!]
  22. Martin J. Osborne, 1992. "Candidate Positioning and Entry in a Political Competition," Department of Economics Working Papers 1992-02, McMaster University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  23. Stefan Krasa & Mattias Polborn, 2007. "Majority-efficiency and Competition-efficiency in a Binary Policy Model," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
  24. Geoffrey Brennan & Alan Hamlin, 1998. "Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 149-175, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  25. Ivo Bischoff, 2005. "Party competition in a heterogeneous electorate: The role of dominant-issue voters," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 221-243, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  26. Alvarez, Michael R. & Nagler, Jonathan, 1997. "A New Approach for Modeling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections," Working Papers 1023, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  27. Anouk Riviere, 2003. "Comparing Electoral Systems: A Geometric Analysis," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 03/6, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Dec 2003. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  28. Enriqueta Aragonés, 1994. "Negativity Effect in Multiparty Electoral Competition," Economics Working Papers 273, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Sep 1997. [Downloadable!]
  29. Stefan Krasa & Mattias Polborn, 2009. "Political Competition between Differentiated Candidates," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
  30. K. Terai, 2003. "Electoral alliance and implemented redistribution: an interpretation on non-competitive politics of Japan," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 235-238, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  31. Stefan Lutz, 1997. "Vertical product differentiation and entry deterrence," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 79-102, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  32. Carrillo, Juan D & Castanheira, Micael, 2002. "Platform Divergence, Political Efficiency and the Median Voter Theorem," CEPR Discussion Papers 3180, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  33. Simon Loertscher & Gerd Muehlheusser, 2008. "Dynamic Location Games," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1042, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
  34. Enriqueta Aragonés & Zvika Neeman, 1994. "Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition," Economics Working Papers 162, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Apr 1996. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  35. Bernardo Moreno & M. Puy, 2009. "Plurality Rule Works In Three-Candidate Elections," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 145-162, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-19.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.