This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations for " The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis"

by Megginson, William L & Nash, Robert C & van Randenborgh, Matthias

For a complete description of this item, click here.
Cited by (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.):
  1. A. Gledson de Carvalho & Francisco Anuatti-Neto & Milton Barossi-Filho & Roberto Macedo, 2003. "Costs and Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Brazil," RES Working Papers 3149, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  2. Andres, Luis & Guasch, Jose Luis & Azumendi, Sebastian Lopez, 2008. "Regulatory governance and sector performance : methodology and evaluation for Electricity distribution in Latin America," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4494, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  3. Scott Wallsten, 2003. "Of Carts and Horses: Regulation and Privatization in Telecommunications Reforms," Journal of Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 217-231, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Hervé Alexandre & Gérard Charreaux, 2001. "Efficiency of French Privatizations:A Dynamic Vision," Working Papers FARGO 011001, Université de Bourgogne - LEG/Fargo (Research center in Finance,organizational ARchitecture and GOvernance), revised Oct 2001. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Gerhard Glomm & Fabio Mendez, 2005. "Does Inefficiency Justify Privatization? The Case of Intermediate Industry Monopolies," Macroeconomics 0507024, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
  6. John S. Earle, . "Post-Privatisation Ownership Structure and Productivity in Russian Industrial Enterprises," Working Papers 1999.19, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
  7. Frydman, Roman & Gray, Cheryl & Hessel, Marek P. & Rapaczynski, Andrzej, 1998. "When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies," Working Papers 98-32, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University. [Downloadable!]
  8. Dieter Bös & Christoph Lülfesmann, 2001. "Holdups, Quality Choice, and the Achilles' Heel in Government Contracting," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers bgse28_2001, University of Bonn, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  9. Richard B. Goud Jr., 2002. "Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from 25 Countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union," Development and Comp Systems 0207002, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
  10. Josse Delfgaauw & Robert A. J. Dur, 2003. "From Public Monopsony to Competitive Market: More Efficiency but Higher Prices," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo GmbH. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Alberto Chong & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, 2003. "The Truth About Privatization in Latin America," RES Working Papers 3180, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  12. Paul Carrillo & Orazio Bellettini & Elizabeth Coombs, 2007. "Mantenerse público o privatizar? Análisis comparativo del servicio de agua entre Quito y Guayaquil," RES Working Papers 3237, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  13. Máximo Torero, 2003. "Peruvian Privatization: Impacts On Firm Performance," RES Working Papers 3173, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  14. Gérard Charreaux, 1997. "L'entreprise publique est-elle nécessairement moins efficace?," Working Papers FARGO 0970901, Université de Bourgogne - LEG/Fargo (Research center in Finance,organizational ARchitecture and GOvernance). [Downloadable!]
  15. Wallsten, Scott, 2002. "Does sequencing matter? regulation and privatization in telecommunications reforms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2817, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  16. Wolf, C. & Pollitt, M.G., 2008. "Privatising national oil companies: Assessing the impact on firm performance," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0811, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [Downloadable!]
  17. David Dawley & Jamal Haidar, 2008. "Privatization and Financial Performance: Can Value Be Created by Privatizing State Owned Enterprises in the Middle East & North Africa (MENA) Region?," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  18. Natália Pimenta Monteiro, 2004. "Using propensity matching estimators to evaluate the impact of privatisation on wages," NIPE Working Papers 12/2004, NIPE - Universidade do Minho. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  19. J. David Brown & John S. Earle, 2000. "Competition and Firm Performance: Lessons from Russia," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 296, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  20. Hervé Alexandre & Gérard Charreaux, 2001. "L'efficacité des privatisations françaises: une vision dynamique à travers la théorie de la gouvernance," Working Papers FARGO 1011002, Université de Bourgogne - LEG/Fargo (Research center in Finance,organizational ARchitecture and GOvernance), revised Oct 2001. [Downloadable!]
  21. Witold J. Henisz & Bennet A. Zelner, 2004. "Interest Groups, Veto Points And Electricity Infrastructure Deployment," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2004-711, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  22. Brown, J. David & Earle, John S. & Telegdy, Álmos, 2008. "Employment and Wage Effects of Privatization: Evidence from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine," IZA Discussion Papers 3688, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
  23. Kathryn L. DeWenter & Paul H. Malatesta, 2001. "State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(1), pages 320-334, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  24. Garcia-Murillo, Martha, 2005. "International Broadband Deployment: The Impact of Unbundling," MPRA Paper 2442, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  25. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon, 1999. "Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic," CEPR Discussion Papers 2145, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  26. Bartel, Ann P. & Harrison, Ann E., 2000. "Ownership versus environment : disentangling the sources of public sector inefficiency," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2272, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  27. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Ekta Selarka, 2008. "Impact of M&A on firm performance in India: Implications for concentration of ownership and insider entrenchment," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp907, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
  28. Bernardo Bortolotti & Mara Faccio, 2004. "Reluctant Privatization," Working Papers 2004.130, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
  29. James A. Schmitz, 1996. "The role played by public enterprises: how much does it differ across countries?," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Spr, pages 2-15. [Downloadable!]
  30. Frydman, R. & Hessel, M. & Rapaczynski, A., 2000. "Why Ownership Matters? Entrepreneurship and the Restructuring of Enterprises in Central Europe," Working Papers 00-03, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University. [Downloadable!]
  31. Andrei Shleifer, 1998. "State Versus Private Ownership," NBER Working Papers 6665, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  32. Charles Calomiris & Raymond Fisman & Yongxiang Wang, 2008. "Profiting from Government Stakes in a Command Economy: Evidence from Chinese Asset Sales," NBER Working Papers 13774, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  33. Paul Carrillo & Orazio Bellettini & Elizabeth Coombs, 2007. "Stay Public or Go Private?: A Comparative Analysis of Water Services between Quito and Guayaquil," RES Working Papers 3236, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  34. Martha Garcia-Murillo, 2003. "Assessing The Impact Of Internet Telephony On The Deployment Of Telecommunications Infrastructure," Working Papers 03-04, NET Institute, revised Feb 2004. [Downloadable!]
  35. Ming Lu & Zhao Chen & Shuang Zhang, 2008. "Paying for the Dream of Public Ownership: Case Studies on Corruption and Privatization in China," Transition Studies Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 355-373, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  36. Qi Quan & Nancy Huyghebaert, 2005. "Share Issuing Privatizations in China: Determinants of Public Share Allocation and Underpricing," LICOS Discussion Papers 16205, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, K.U.Leuven. [Downloadable!]
  37. Narjess Boubakri & Jean-Claude Cosset & Omrance Guedhami, 2001. "Liberalization, Corporate Governance, and the Performance of Newly Privatized Firms," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 419, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
  38. Juan Carlos Barcena-Ruiz & M. Begona Garzon, 2001. "Mixed Oligopoly and Environmental Policy," BILTOKI 200105, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística). [Downloadable!]
  39. Ann P. Bartel & Ann E. Harrison, 1999. "Ownership versus Environment: Why are Public Sector Firms Inefficient?," NBER Working Papers 7043, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  40. Perotti, Enrico, 2004. "State ownership - a residual role?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3407, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  41. J. David Brown & John S. Earle & Almos Telegdy, 2004. "Does Privatization Raise Productivity? Evidence from Comprehensive Panel Data on Manufacturing Firms in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine," Staff Working Papers 04-107, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  42. Vaaler, Paul M. & Schrage, Burkhard N., 2007. "Residual State Factors, Policy Stability and Financial Performance Following Strategic Decisions by Privatizing Telecoms," Working Papers 07-0102, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business. [Downloadable!]
  43. Nicholas Barberis & Maxim Boycko & Andrei Shleifer & Natalia Tsukanova, 1995. "How Does Privatization Work? Evidence from the Russian Shops," NBER Working Papers 5136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  44. Madden, Gary G & Savage, Scott J & Ng, Jason, 2003. "Asia-Pacific telecommunications liberalisation and productivity performance," MPRA Paper 10884, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  45. John S. Earle & Almos Telegdy, 2002. "Privatization Methods and Productivity Effects in Romanian Industrial Enterprises," Staff Working Papers 02-81, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  46. Bernardo Bortolotti & Paolo Pinotti, 2008. "Delayed privatization," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 663, Bank of Italy, Economic Research Department. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  47. Narjess Boubakri & Jean-Claude Cosset & Omrane Guedhami, 2003. "Postprivatization Corporate Governance: the Role of Ownership Structure and Investor Protection," Working Papers 2003.37, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
  48. Mauricio Garrón B. & Carlos Gustavo Machicado & Katherina Capra, 2003. "Privatization in Bolivia: The Impact on Firm Performance," RES Working Papers 3154, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  49. Djankov, Simeon, 1999. "Restructuring of insider-dominated firms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2046, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  50. Clarke, George R. G. & Cull, Robert, 2001. "Bank privatization in Argentina : a model of political constraints and differential outcomes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2633, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  51. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon & Pohl, Gerhard, 1997. "Ownership and corporate governance : evidence from the Czech Republic," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1737, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  52. Pablo Arocena, 2004. "Privatisation Policy in Spain: Stuck Between Liberalisation and the Protection of Nationals’ Interests," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo GmbH. [Downloadable!]
  53. David W. Gillen & Jean-François Wen, 2000. "Taxing Hydroelectricity in Ontario," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 26(1), pages 35-49, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  54. Céline Chatelin, 2003. "Stakeholder Governance and Organizational Performance: Lessons from past privatizations;Gouvernance partenariale et performance organisationnelle:les enseignements des privatisations passées," Working Papers FARGO 1030102, Université de Bourgogne - LEG/Fargo (Research center in Finance,organizational ARchitecture and GOvernance). [Downloadable!]
  55. Frydman, Roman & Gray, Cheryl & Hessel, Marek & Rapaczynski, Andrzej, 1997. "Private Ownership and Corporate Performance: Some Lessons from Transition Economies," Working Papers 97-28, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University. [Downloadable!]
  56. Sebastián Galiani and Federico Sturzenegger, . "The Impact of Privatization on the Earnings of Restructured Workers," Business School Working Papers longterm, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. [Downloadable!]
  57. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Shubhashis Gangopadhyay & Shagun Krishnan, 2006. "Reforms, Entry and Productivity: Some Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector," IZA Discussion Papers 2086, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  58. J. David Brown & John Earle & Almos Telegdy, 2005. "Does Privatization Hurt Workers? Lessons from Comprehensive Manufacturing Firm Panel Data in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine," CERT Discussion Papers 0509, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  59. Noelia Martín Morales, 2003. "La privatización de activos desde un punto de vista macroeconómico: evidencia empírica usando un modelo de crecimiento económico para América Latina," Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC 2003-09, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC. [Downloadable!]
  60. Federico Sturzenegger & Ernesto Schargrodsky & Sebastian Galiani & Paul Gertler, 2003. "The Costs and Benefits of Privatization in Argentina: A Microeconomic Analysis," RES Working Papers 3148, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  61. Langnan Chen & Steven Li & Yijia Chen, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance: Some Evidence from Newly Listed Firms on Chinese Stock Markets," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 204, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology. [Downloadable!]
  62. Céline Chatelin, 2003. "Privatization and Stakeholder Governance:Theoretical and Methodological issues;Privatisation et gouvernance partenariale enjeux théoriques et méthodologiques," Working Papers FARGO 1030101, Université de Bourgogne - LEG/Fargo (Research center in Finance,organizational ARchitecture and GOvernance). [Downloadable!]
  63. Alan Bevan & Saul Estrin & Mark E. Schaffer, 1999. "Determinants of Enterprise Performance during Transition," CERT Discussion Papers 9903, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University. [Downloadable!]
  64. Nandini Gupta & John C. Ham & Jan Svejnar, 2000. "Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Theory and Evidence from the Czech Republic," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 323, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  65. Tian, Lihui & Estrin, Saul, 2005. "Retained State Shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does Government Ownership Reduce Corporate Value?," IZA Discussion Papers 1493, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  66. Wolfgang Aussenegg, 1999. "Going Public in Poland: Case-by-Case Privatizations, Mass Privatization and Private Sector Initial Public Offerings," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 292, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
  67. Frydman, Roman & Gray, Cheryl W. & Hessel, Marek & Rapaczynski, Andrzej, 1997. "Private ownership and corporate performance : some lessons from transition economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1830, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  68. Xiaonian Xu & Yan Wang, 1997. "Ownership structure, corporate governance, and corporate performance : the case of Chinese stock companies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1794, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  69. Zakolyukina Anastasia, 2006. "Bankrtuptcy in Russia: External Management Performance," EERC Working Paper Series 06-09e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS. [Downloadable!]
  70. Bernardo Bortolotti & Mara Faccio, 2006. "Reluctant Privatization," CEI Working Paper Series 2006-5, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University. [Downloadable!]
  71. Nandini Gupta, 2001. "Partial Privatization And Firm Performance: Evidence From India," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 426, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  72. Juan Carlos Barcena-Ruiz & M. Begona Garzon, 2001. "International Trade and Strategic Privatization," BILTOKI 200107, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística). [Downloadable!]
  73. Berkman, Henk & Cole, Rebel & Fu , Lawrence, 2007. "Improving corporate governance where the State is the controlling block holder: Evidence from China," MPRA Paper 8088, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  74. Djankov, Simeon, 1999. "Ownership structure and enterprise restructuring in six newly independent states," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2047, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  75. Stephen Yeaple & Warren Moskowitz, 1995. "The literature on privatization," Research Paper 9514, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. [Downloadable!]
  76. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silane, 1997. "The Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Mexico," NBER Working Papers 6215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  77. Juan Carlos Barcena-Ruiz & M. Begona Garzon, 2001. "Economic Integration and Privatization of Publicly-owned Firms," BILTOKI 200110, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística). [Downloadable!]
  78. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon, 1998. "Politicians and firms in seven central and eastern European countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1954, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  79. Carlos Pombo & Rodrigo Taborda, 2004. "Performance and efficiency in Colombia's power utilities: an assessment of the 1994 reform," BORRADORES DE INVESTIGACIÓN 003322, UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO - FACULTAD DE ECONOMÍA. [Downloadable!]
  80. Andrew Weiss & Georgiy Nikitin, 2004. "Foreign Portfolio Investment Improves Performance: Evidence from the Czech Republic," Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1205-1205. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  81. Jana Fidrmucova, 2000. "Channels of Restructuring in Privatized Czech Companies," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1358, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
  82. Andres, Luis & Foster, Vivien & Guasch, Jose Luis, 2006. "The impact of privatization on the performance of the infrastructure sector : the case of electricity distribution in Latin American countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3936, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  83. Aaron Tornell, 1999. "Privatizing the Privatized," NBER Working Papers 7206, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  84. J. Harold Mulherin & Jeffry M. Netter & Michael Stegemoller, 2001. "Privatization and the Market for Corporate Control," Claremont Colleges Working Papers 2001-21, Claremont Colleges. [Downloadable!]
  85. Elisabetta BERTERO, 2006. "Does a change in the ownership of firms, from public to private, make a difference?," Departemental Working Papers 2006-03, Department of Economics University of Milan Italy. [Downloadable!]
  86. Florencio Lopez-de-Silane, 1996. "Determinants of Privatization Prices," NBER Working Papers 5494, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  87. Modén, Karl-Markus & Norbäck, Pehr-Johan & Persson, Lars, 2007. "Efficiency and Ownership Structure – The Case of Poland," Working Paper Series 703, Research Institute of Industrial Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  88. Alexander Pivovarsky, . "How Does Privatization Work? Ownership Concentration and Enterprise Performance in Ukraine," IMF Working Papers 01/42, International Monetary Fund. [Downloadable!]
  89. T. T. Ram Mohan & Subhash C. Ray, 2003. "Technical Efficiency in Public and Private Sectors in India: Evidence from the Post-Reform Years," Working papers 2003-22, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
Did you know? No RePEc service, like IDEAS, charges for the use or the display of bibliographic data.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-26.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.