Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Does it matter how happiness is measured? Evidence from a randomized controlled experiment

Contents:

Author Info

  • Raphael Studer
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    A continuous and a discrete rating scale were implemented for a single item happiness question in a representative survey. A randomized controlled experiment enables unique analyses on data quality and distributions, which suggest superiority of the continuous scale. Results raise doubts about earlier inferences drawn on correlates of happiness. So far only self-assessed discrete happiness data have been used for research into the determinants of happiness. However, distribution distortions were found for the numerically labeled discrete scale, especially for women. Through this discretization bias, the widely reported gender happiness inequality puzzle can be explained.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.econ.uzh.ch/static/wp/econwp049.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Department of Economics - University of Zurich in its series ECON - Working Papers with number 049.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Nov 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zur:econwp:049

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Bl├╝mlisalpstrasse 10, CH-8006 Z├╝rich
    Phone: +41-1-634 22 05
    Fax: +41-1-634 49 07
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.econ.uzh.ch/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Happiness; subjective well-being; life satisfaction; likert scale; visual analogue scale; rating scales; gender inequalities; gender gap;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zur:econwp:049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marita Kieser).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.