IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzblpe/spi2004104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entwicklung des Qualifikationsbedarfs im Gesundheitssektor: Professionalisierungsprozesse in der Physiotherapie und Dentalhygiene im europäischen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Theobald, Hildegard

Abstract

Veränderte Anforderungen im Gesundheitswesen, wie Forderungen nach Patientenorientierung, der Integration fragmentierter Versorgungssysteme oder einer verstärkten Berücksichtigung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse stellen Organisation und Arbeitsweisen im deutschen Gesundheitswesen derzeit vor grundlegende Herausforderungen. Die Entwicklung neuer Organisationsformen und Arbeitsweisen geht weit über Ansätze einer Restrukturierung auf Systemebene hinaus. Entscheidend für eine erfolgreiche Reorganisation wird die Re-Definition von Qualifikationsanforderungen sowie Formen der Arbeitsteilung und Kooperation zwischen Angehörigen verschiedener Gesundheitsberufe. Die Tendenzen bleiben nicht auf Deutschland begrenzt, sondern sind ebenso in anderen europäischen Ländern vorzufinden. In den folgenden Ausführungen werden am Beispiel der Berufsgruppen 'DentalhygienikerInnen' und 'PhysiotherapeutInnen' Veränderungen der Qualifikation - Niveau und Inhalt - und Berufspraxis im europäischen Vergleich untersucht. Im europäischen Vergleich können die Spezifika der deutschen Entwicklung, mögliche zukünftige Perspektiven und der Einfluss der europäischen Integration aufgezeigt werden. In die Untersuchung der Veränderungsprozesse werden Verbände, Kammern und Schulen als wichtigen Akteure einbezogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Theobald, Hildegard, 2004. "Entwicklung des Qualifikationsbedarfs im Gesundheitssektor: Professionalisierungsprozesse in der Physiotherapie und Dentalhygiene im europäischen Vergleich," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2004-104, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2004104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44025/1/393838188.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tovey, Philip & Adams, Jon, 2001. "Primary care as intersecting social worlds," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 695-706, March.
    2. Light, Donald W., 2001. "Comparative institutional response to economic policy managed competition and governmentality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 1151-1166, April.
    3. Batterham, R. & Southern, D. & Appleby, N. & Elsworth, G. & Fabris, S. & Dunt, D. & Young, D., 2002. "Construction of a GP integration model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1225-1241, April.
    4. Light, Donald W., 2001. "Managed competition, governmentality and institutional response in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 1167-1181, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skinner, Mark W. & Rosenberg, Mark W., 2006. "Managing competition in the countryside: Non-profit and for-profit perceptions of long-term care in rural Ontario," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2864-2876, December.
    2. Westra, Daan & Angeli, Federica & Carree, Martin & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2017. "Understanding competition between healthcare providers: Introducing an intermediary inter-organizational perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 149-157.
    3. Harris, Rebecca & Mosedale, Sarah & Garner, Jayne & Perkins, Elizabeth, 2014. "What factors influence the use of contracts in the context of NHS dental practice? A systematic review of theory and logic model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 54-59.
    4. Mascia, Daniele & Di Vincenzo, Fausto & Cicchetti, Americo, 2012. "Dynamic analysis of interhospital collaboration and competition: Empirical evidence from an Italian regional health system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 273-281.
    5. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    6. Kringos, Dionne S. & Boerma, Wienke G.W. & van der Zee, Jouke & Groenewegen, Peter P., 2013. "Political, cultural and economic foundations of primary care in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-17.
    7. Dunt, D. & Elsworth, G. & Southern, D. & Harris, C. & Potiriadis, M. & Young, D., 2006. "Individual and area factors associated with general practitioner integration in Australia: A multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 680-690, August.
    8. Jane Aronson & Sheila M. Neysmith, 2006. "Obscuring the costs of home care: restructuring at work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(1), pages 27-45, March.
    9. Gross, Revital & Harrison, Michael I., 2006. "Responses of Israeli HMOs to environmental change following the National Health Insurance Law: Opening the black box," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 213-232, April.
    10. Gask, Linda, 2005. "Overt and covert barriers to the integration of primary and specialist mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1785-1794, October.
    11. McDonald, Ruth & Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh & Bayes, Sara & Morriss, Richard & Kai, Joe, 2013. "Competing and coexisting logics in the changing field of English general medical practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 47-54.
    12. Reavley, Nicola & Livingston, Jenni & Buchbinder, Rachelle & Bennell, Kim & Stecki, Chris & Osborne, Richard Harry, 2010. "A systematic grounded approach to the development of complex interventions: The Australian WorkHealth Program - Arthritis as a case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 342-350, February.
    13. Scott R. Rosas, 2017. "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1403-1416, May.
    14. Hussey, P. & Anderson, G. F., 2003. "A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 215-228, December.
    15. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    16. Dolfsma, W.A. & Finch, J. & McMaster, R., 2004. "Market and Society: How do they relate, and contribute to welfare?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2004-105-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Margaret Denton & Isik Zeytinoglu & Karen Kusch & Sharon Davies, 2007. "Market-Modelled Home Care: Impact on Job Satisfaction and Propensity to Leave," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 33(s1), pages 81-99, January.
    18. Randall, Glen E. & Williams, A. Paul, 2006. "Exploring limits to market-based reform: Managed competition and rehabilitation home care services in Ontario," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1594-1604, April.
    19. Jan Kerssens & Peter Groenewegen, 2005. "Consumer preferences in social health insurance," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(1), pages 8-15, March.
    20. Demers, Marie, 2004. "The predictability of individual primary care costs and its impact on managed care plans," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 345-352, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2004104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.