IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbipo/p01302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Humanitäre Hilfe, Flüchtlinge und Konfliktbearbeitung

Author

Listed:
  • Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter

Abstract

Humanitäre Hilfe als Element der zivilen Konfliktbearbeitung zu betrachten, würde ihre Existenzberechtigung grundsätzlich in Frage stellen. Die zentrale These lautet, dass sie somit zum Instrument der politischen Gestaltung mutierte. Humanitäre Hilfe ist dennoch friedenspolitisch noch lange nicht bedeutungslos. Sie ist es, wenn die ihr zugrunde liegenden humanitären Prinzipien, die u.a. im humanitären Völkerrecht wie in der Menschenrechtsdeklaration verankert sind, in der Realität von den Staaten wie den nichtstaatlichen Akteuren geachtet und beachtet werden. Die Durchsetzung dieser Prinzipien entspräche den Bemühungen, Gewalt, wenn sie schon nicht verhindert werden kann, aus der Sicht der Opfer jedenfalls abzumildern. Denn humanitäre Prinzipien weisen in Richtung „Zivilisierung der Gewalt“. Zur Begründung dieser These im Zusammenhang mit der Flüchtlingsproblematik wird erstens eine spezifische Definition von humanitärer Hilfe vorgeschlagen. Zweitens wird die Problematik der humanitären Hilfe in der Gegenwart an Hand einer normativen Konzeption problematisiert. Drittens wird kurz auf die Komplexität der Flüchtlingsproblematik eingegangen, soweit sie für das Thema von Bedeutung ist. Dabei wird die These vertreten, dass die Flüchtlingsproblematik zum einen von der Tendenz her dazu beiträgt, Konflikte strukturell zu perpetuieren, wenn diese nur als humanitäres Problem betrachtet wird. Zugleich kollidiert die politische Bewältigung (oder auch Verdrängung) von Flüchtlingsströmen immer wieder mit der humanitären Zielsetzung. Warum das der Fall ist, soll anhand der Bewältigung der Flüchtlingswelle aus dem Kosovo, die unmittelbar nach dem Beginn der NATO-Luftangriffe auf die Restrepublik Jugoslawien im Frühjahr 1999 nach Albanien und nach Mazedonien überschwappte, illustriert werden. Hierfür wird der Evaluierungsbericht, den der Hohe Kommissar der Vereinten Nationen für Flüchtling (UNHCR) herangezogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter, 2001. "Humanitäre Hilfe, Flüchtlinge und Konfliktbearbeitung," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 01-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbipo:p01302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49837/1/335951228.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Risse, Thomas, 2000. "“Let's Argue!†: Communicative Action in World Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 1-39, January.
    2. Schloms, Michael, 2000. "Divide et impera: Totalitärer Staat und humanitäre Hilfe in Nordkorea," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 00-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Engel, 2006. "The Difficult Reception of Rigorous Descriptive Social Science in the Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_1, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    2. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Anna Horv‡th, 2007. "Committee Governance after the Enlargement of the EU: the Institutionalisation of Cooperation within the Social Protection Committee," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 6(March), pages 53-73.
    4. Stacie E. Goddard, 2020. "Revolution from the Inside: Institutions, Legitimation Strategies, and Rhetorical Pathways of Institutional Change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 83-92, October.
    5. Holzscheiter, Anna, 2017. "Im Anfang war das Wort... und es ward Schnee von gestern? Das Vermächtnis der zib-Debatte zum kommunikativen Handeln," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 127-129.
    6. Daniel Verdier, 2009. "Successful and Failed Screening Mechanisms in the Two Gulf Wars," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 311-342, July.
    7. Rousseau, Ronald & Liu, Yuxian & Guns, Raf, 2013. "Mathematical properties of Q-measures," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 737-745.
    8. Hannes Hansen‐Magnusson & Antje Wiener, 2010. "Studying Contemporary Constitutionalism: Memory, Myth and Horizon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 21-44, January.
    9. Bernd Hayo & Pierre-Guillaume Méon, 2013. "Behind closed doors: Revealing the ECB’s decision rule," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 37, pages 135-160, October.
    10. Holzscheiter, Anna, 2017. "Was vom arguing übrigblieb… Der Nachhall der kommunikativen Wende in den Internationalen Beziehungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 143-159.
    11. Marcus Holmes & Costas Panagopoulos, 2014. "The social brain paradigm and social norm puzzles," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(3), pages 384-404, July.
    12. Éric Montpetit, 2003. "Public Consultations in Policy Network Environments: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(1), pages 95-109, March.
    13. Post, Diahanna L., 2004. "Diffusion of International Food Safety Standards: Developing Country Experiences," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30661, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    14. Benjamin Martill & Uta Staiger, 2021. "Negotiating Brexit: The Cultural Sources of British Hard Bargaining," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 261-277, March.
    15. Giselle Bosse, 2022. "Does the EU Have Moral Authority? A Communicative Action Perspective on Sanctions," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 16-25.
    16. Per M. Norheim‐Martinsen, 2010. "Beyond Intergovernmentalism: European Security and Defence Policy and the Governance Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1351-1365, November.
    17. Hannes Hansen-Magnusson & Antje Wiener, 2010. "Studying Contemporary Constitutionalism: Memory, Myth and Horizon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 21-44, January.
    18. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 191-219, March.
    19. Mason, Michael, 2002. "Transnational compensation for oil pollution damage: examining changing spatialities of environmental liability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 570, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Florence Dafe & Rebecca Elisabeth Husebye Engebretsen, 2023. "Tussle for space: The politics of mock‐compliance with global financial standards in developing countries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 328-345, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbipo:p01302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.