IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/112012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional obstacles for the implementation of a River Basin Management concept in Western Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Hagemann, Nina

Abstract

This paper provides results from a case study in Western Ukraine where a River Basin Management (RBM) concept for the Western Bug River has been initiated. Ukraine aims at the introduction of an integrated water resources management implemented through a river basin organizational structure based on the principles of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Even though the implementation process has been initiated for the Western Bug River catchment the process came to halt. The paper aims at outlining the structural deficits that hinder a successful implementation of a RBM concept in the case study area. The results show that in Ukraine - a country still in transition - the institutional structure is not well enough established to organize a process that calls for new institutions and governance structures that challenges even industrialized countries. More precisely, the challenges for Ukraine lie within the inconsistency of the institutional framework that is made explicit when looking at the decentralization process that has been initiated right after independence but is not yet concluded.

Suggested Citation

  • Hagemann, Nina, 2012. "Institutional obstacles for the implementation of a River Basin Management concept in Western Ukraine," UFZ Discussion Papers 11/2012, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:112012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/62121/1/722492367.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kataryna Wolczuk, 2009. "Implementation without Coordination: The Impact of EU Conditionality on Ukraine under the European Neighbourhood Policy," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 187-211.
    2. Barry R. Weingast, 2008. "The Performance and Stability of Federalism: An Institutional Perspective," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 7, pages 149-172, Springer.
    3. Konrad Hagedorn, 2008. "Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(4), pages 606-606, December.
    4. Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), 2008. "Handbook of New Institutional Economics," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-69305-5, November.
    5. Bruce Mitchell, 2005. "Integrated Water Resource Management, Institutional Arrangements, and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1335-1352, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guccio, Calogero & Mazza, Isidoro & Mignosa, Anna & Rizzo, Ilde, 2018. "A round trip on decentralization in the tourism sector," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 140-155.
    2. Robert Patrick & Lalita Bharadwaj, 2016. "Mining and campesino engagement: an opportunity for integrated water resources management in Ancash, Peru," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 468-482, May.
    3. Busscher, Tim & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2015. "In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 42-51.
    4. Wenwen Sheng & M. C. Sunny Wong, 2017. "Capital Flow Management Policies and Riskiness of External Liability Structures: the Role of Local Financial Markets," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 461-498, July.
    5. Griewald, Yuliana, 2018. "The Art of the State to Intervene: Insights Into Agricultural Land Management in Russia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Konrad Hagedorn, 2013. "Natural resource management: the role of cooperative institutions and governance," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 2(1), pages 101-121, September.
    7. Thierry Madiès & Emmanuelle Taugourdeau, 2020. "Vertical transfers and tax competition: does trade integration matter?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(3), pages 453-475, October.
    8. Nicola Gennaioli & Enrico Perotti, 2009. "Standardized enforcement: Access to justice vs contractual innovation," Economics Working Papers 1329, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jun 2012.
    9. Spiller, Pablo T., 2013. "Transaction cost regulation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 232-242.
    10. Rodrigues, Carla & Fidélis, Teresa, 2019. "The integration of land use in public water reservoirs plans – A critical analysis of the regulatory approaches used for the protection of banks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 762-775.
    11. Militiades N. Georgiou & Nicholas Kyriazis & Emmanouil M. L. Economou, 2015. "Democracy, Political Stability and Economic performance. A Panel Data Analysis," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18.
    12. Mwakatumbula, Hilda Jacob & Moshi, Goodiel Charles & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2019. "Consumer protection in the telecommunication sector: A comparative institutional analysis of five African countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    13. Daedlow, Katrin & Beckmann, Volker & Schlüter, Maja & Arlinghaus, Robert, 2013. "Explaining institutional persistence, adaptation, and transformation in East German recreational-fisheries governance after the German reunification in 1990," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 36-50.
    14. Maaß, Oliver & Grundmann, Philipp & von Bock und Polach, Carlotta, 2014. "Added-value from innovative value chains by establishing nutrient cycles via struvite," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 126-136.
    15. Lambini, Cosmas Kombat & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2014. "A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: Evidence from Ghana and Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 178-190.
    16. Maria Angela Perito & Marcello De Rosa & Luca Bartoli & Emilio Chiodo & Giuseppe Martino, 2017. "Heterogeneous Organizational Arrangements in Agrifood Chains: A Governance Value Analysis Perspective on the Sheep and Goat Meat Sector of Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    17. O'Brien, G. C. & Dickens, Chris & Hines, E. & Wepener, V. & Stassen, R. & Landis, W. G., 2017. "A regional scale ecological risk framework for environmental flow evaluations," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 22(2):957-9.
    18. Hanna Almlöf & Per-Olof Bjuggren, 2019. "A regulation and transaction cost perspective on the design of corporate law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 407-433, June.
    19. Saima SARWAR* & M. Wasif SIDDIQI**, 2018. "AN ATTEMPT TO CRYSTALIZE THE BLACK-BOX MYSTERY: Institutional Quality or Constitutional Rights," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 28(1), pages 103-130.
    20. Jan Fałkowski & Alessandro Olper, 2014. "Political competition and policy choices: the evidence from agricultural protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 143-158, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transition countries; Ukraine; River Basin Management; Decentralization;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:112012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.