IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/udewwd/144.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vergütungsfindung auf dem stationären Pflegemarkt in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Bestandaufnahme und Alternativen

Author

Listed:
  • Wasem, Jürgen
  • Rothgang, Heinz
  • Greß, Stefan

Abstract

Im Januar 2002 hat der Landtag Nordrhein-Westfalen die Enquetekommission "Situation und Zukunft der Pflege in NRW" eingerichtet. Die Kommission hatte den Auftrag, Antworten auf die Frage zu finden, welche Rahmenbedingungen das Land schaffen kann und welche Impulse es geben muss, um die Qualität der Pflege zu gewährleisten und auszubauen. Um diesem Auftrag gerecht zu werden, benötigte die Kommission u.a. Informationen über die Vergütung der gewerblich erbrachten Pflegeleistungen als einer wesentlichen Determinante der Qualität und Quantität der erbrachten Leistungen. Aus diesem Grund hatte sich die Enquetekommission darauf verständigt, eine Studie anfertigen zu lassen, in der für den stationären Bereich die derzeitigen Entgeltfindungsmechanismen beschrieben und bewertet, sowie Alternativen auf ihre relativen Vor- und Nachteile untersucht werden. Die Autoren haben es übernommen, eine derartige Studie anzufertigen, in der folgende Fragen behandelt werden sollen: 1. Wie läuft die Vergütungsfindung derzeit ab und welche Ergebnisse resultieren? 2. Welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich aus den so gesetzten Anreizen für das Verhalten der Einrichtungsträger? 3. Welche Alternativen zur Entgeltfindung gibt es grundsätzlich, welche Voraussetzungen erfordern diese Alternativen, welche Vor- und Nachteile sind damit verbunden und welche Ausgestaltungsoptionen sind zu bedenken?

Suggested Citation

  • Wasem, Jürgen & Rothgang, Heinz & Greß, Stefan, 2005. "Vergütungsfindung auf dem stationären Pflegemarkt in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Bestandaufnahme und Alternativen," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 144, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:udewwd:144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/23148/1/144.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. A. Mirrlees, 1999. "The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour: Part I," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(1), pages 3-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hange, Ulrich, 2015. "The Market for Nursing Homes in Germany: a spatial competition approach," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112853, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Roman Mennicken & Boris Augurzky & Heinz Rothgang & Jürgen Wasem, 2014. "Explaining differences in remuneration rates of nursing homes in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 401-410, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perrin Lefebvre & David Martimort, 2022. "Delegation, capture and endogenous information structures," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 34(3), pages 357-414, July.
    2. Danielsson, Jon & Jorgensen, Bjorn N. & de Vries, Casper G., 2002. "Incentives for effective risk management," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1407-1425, July.
    3. Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2018. "Moral hazard: Base models and two extensions," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 16, pages 453-485, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Oliver Denk & Jean‐Baptiste Michau, 2018. "Optimal Social Security with Imperfect Tagging," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(3), pages 717-762, July.
    5. Santos, Joao C., 1997. "Debt and equity as optimal contracts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 355-366, December.
    6. Michael T. Rauh & Giulio Seccia, 2010. "Agency and Anxiety," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 87-116, March.
      • Michael T. Rauh & Giulio Seccia, 2006. "Agency and Anxiety," Working Papers 2006-02, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    7. Cai, W. & Singham, D.I., 2018. "A principal–agent problem with heterogeneous demand distributions for a carbon capture and storage system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 239-256.
    8. Bhaskar, Venkataraman, 2012. "Dynamic Moral Hazard, Learning and Belief Manipulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 8948, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Bond, Philip & Newman, Andrew F., 2009. "Prohibitions on punishments in private contracts," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 526-540, October.
    10. Yanikoglu, I., 2014. "Robust optimization methods for chance constrained, simulation-based, and bilevel problems," Other publications TiSEM 45826f7e-6e21-481e-889e-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Mungiria, James & Ondabu, Ibrahim, 2019. "Role of Credit Reference Bureau On Financial Intermediation: Evidence from The Commercial Banks in Kenya," MPRA Paper 95050, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Martin F. Hellwig & Klaus M. Schmidt, 2002. "Discrete-Time Approximations of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Brownian-Motion Model of Intertemporal Incentive Provision," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(6), pages 2225-2264, November.
    13. Quintero Jaramillo, Jose E., 2004. "Liquidity constraints and credit subsidies in auctions," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb040604, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    14. Uddin, Md Hamid & Mollah, Sabur & Islam, Nazrul & Ali, Md Hakim, 2023. "Does digital transformation matter for operational risk exposure?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Ghossoub, Mario, 2010. "Supplement to "Belief heterogeneity in the Arrow-Borch-Raviv insurance model"," MPRA Paper 37717, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 22 Mar 2012.
    16. Ravi Kanbur & Jukka Pirttilä & Matti Tuomala, 2008. "Moral Hazard, Income Taxation and Prospect Theory," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(2), pages 321-337, June.
    17. Alexander Karaivanov, 2003. "Financial Contracts and Occupational Choice," Computing in Economics and Finance 2003 25, Society for Computational Economics.
    18. Henry Penikas, 2023. "Unaccounted model risk for Basel IRB models deemed acceptable by conventional validation criteria," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Mirman, Leonard J. & Santugini, Marc, 2013. "Firms, shareholders, and financial markets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 152-164.
    20. Sandner, Kai, 2008. "Balancing Performance Measures When Agents Behave Competitively in an Environment With Technological Interdependencies," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 2113, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:udewwd:144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwessde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.