IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tukbcf/18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A comparative study on the scope and quality of the sustainability reporting of the TecDAX30 companies

Author

Listed:
  • Schönbohm, Avo
  • Hoffmann, Ulrike

Abstract

This paper examines the current practice in sustainability reporting among the German TecDAX 30 companies on the basis of their published sustainability reports for 2009. A scoring-system has been developed with 74 indicators, based on the international Reporting Guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative. The examination of the reports shows that nearly half of TecDAX companies did not publish any data about aspects of sustainability and most of the remaining companies did not publish meaningful and complete reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Schönbohm, Avo & Hoffmann, Ulrike, 2011. "A comparative study on the scope and quality of the sustainability reporting of the TecDAX30 companies," Beiträge zur Controlling-Forschung 18, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensrechnung und Controlling.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tukbcf:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/57902/1/715578316.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quick, Reiner & Knocinski, M., 2006. "Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung : empirische Befunde zur Berichterstattungspraxis von HDAXUnternehmen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 24925, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Lingnau, Volker & Kreklow, Katharina, 2011. "Ausrichtung der Unternehmensführung auf nachhaltige Wertschöpfung nach dem Deutschen Corporate Governance Kodex?," Beiträge zur Controlling-Forschung 16, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensrechnung und Controlling.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thorsten Knauer & Arnt Wöhrmann, 2010. "Rahmenbedingungen, Charakteristika und Konsequenzen freiwilliger Unternehmenspublizität – State of the Art und neue Perspektiven der empirischen Forschung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 235-254, November.
    2. Avo Schönbohm & Astupan D., 2012. "Sustainability Reporting Performance In Poland: Empirical Evidence From The Wig 20 And Mwig 40 Companies," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 6(1), pages 68-80, December.
    3. Maryna Gulenko, 2018. "Mandatory CSR reporting—literature review and future developments in Germany [Nichtfinanzielle Berichterstattungspflicht – Literaturzusammenfassung und Mögliche Entwicklungen in Deutschland]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 3-17, December.
    4. Carsten Albers & Thomas Günther, 2010. "Disclose or not disclose: determinants of social reporting for STOXX Europe 600 firms," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 323-347, November.
    5. Luis Jesús Córdova-Aguirre & Juan Manuel Ramón-Jerónimo, 2021. "Exploring the Inclusion of Sustainability into Strategy and Management Control Systems in Peruvian Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2019. "Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure and Its Consequences on the Sustainability Reporting Quality of Italian and German Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-28, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tukbcf:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dekaide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.