IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucdir/32011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovationskompetenz und Performanz

Author

Listed:
  • Hallensleben, Tobias
  • Jain, Anil K.
  • Manger, Daniela
  • Moldaschl, Manfred

Abstract

Welche Rolle spielen Innovationen für den Bestand und den Erfolg von Unternehmen in einer Wettbewerbswirtschaft? Das ist wohl die grundlegendste Frage, die sich die Managementwissenschaft in Bezug auf Strategien der Neuerung stellt. Vielfach begnügt sie sich mit der Antwort, daß die Bedeutung von Innovationen zunehme (was an wachsenden FuEAufwendungen, kürzeren Produktlebenszyklen und ähnlichen Indikatoren abgelesen wird) und fragt dann, was Unternehmen in die Lage versetzt, Innovationen besser zu managen (mehr, schneller, radikaler, effizienter). So definiert sich Innovationsmanagement als Fach. Seit sich die Organisationsforschung und -theorie immer mehr mit Fragen des organisationalen Wandels befasst (weil Wandel wichtiger wird oder weil das Mode ist oder warum auch immer) und das Strategische Management als weitere Subdisziplin die Leitfrage, welche Unternehmensstrategien nachhaltige Wettbewerbsvorteile versprechen, überwiegend mit „Entwicklung von Innovationsfähigkeit“ beantwortet, wächst hier gegen den Spezialisierungstrend ein Forschungsfeld zusammen. In diesem verortet sich unser Beitrag. Die erste Frage ist eine genuine der Unternehmenstheorie, auch wenn sie natürlich empiristisch behandelt werden kann - also theorielos. Im vorliegenden Beitrag stellen wir Ergebnisse unserer empirischen Arbeiten zur zweiten Frage vor: Was ist Innovationsfähigkeit, und wie erlangt man sie? Sie basieren auf dem theoretischen Ansatz der Institutionellen Reflexivität (Moldaschl 2005, 2006), den wir einleitend kurz vorstellen. Er ist seinerseits ein Segment unserer Variante einer Evolutorischen Theorie der Unternehmung, die sich auch mit der erstgenannten Frage beschäftigt (Moldaschl 2011). Sie sucht den konstruktiven Wettbewerb mit der Competence-based View of the Firm und mit Ansätzen, die dieser gegenüber (ebenfalls) kritisch sind, etwa dem Konzept der Ambidexterity (z.B. Feldman/Pentland 2003; Güttel 2009) oder solchen, die auf Austrian Economics bauen (z.B. Lewin/Phelan 2000; Freiling et al. 2006).

Suggested Citation

  • Hallensleben, Tobias & Jain, Anil K. & Manger, Daniela & Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Innovationskompetenz und Performanz," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:32011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55379/1/684999781.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hagedoorn, John & Cloodt, Myriam, 2003. "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1365-1379, September.
    2. Wu, Yen-Chun Jim & Lee, Pi-Ju, 2007. "The use of patent analysis in assessing ITS innovations: US, Europe and Japan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 568-586, July.
    3. Bode, Eckhardt & Dohse, Dirk & Krieger-Boden, Christiane & Sander, Birgit & Soltwedel, Rüdiger & Hagen, Tobias & Brenke, Karl & Eickelpasch, Alexander & Vesper, Dieter & Blien, Uwe & Fuchs, Johann & H, 2002. "Fortschritte beim Aufbau Ost: Forschungsbericht wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschungsinstitute über die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 391, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Horst Hanusch & Andreas Pyka, 2007. "Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 275-289, March.
    5. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Warum Gazellen nachts nicht leuchten: Evolutorische Theorie der Unternehmung," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 1/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Joerg Freiling, 2004. "A Competence-based Theory of the Firm," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 27-52.
    8. Lewin, Peter & Phelan, Steven E, 2000. "An Austrian Theory of the Firm," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 59-79, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Warum Gazellen nachts nicht leuchten: Evolutorische Theorie der Unternehmung," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 1/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Kibaek Lee & Jaeheung Yoo & Munkee Choi & Hangjung Zo & Andrew P Ciganek, 2016. "Does External Knowledge Sourcing Enhance Market Performance? Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    5. Zheng, Yanfeng & Liu, Jing & George, Gerard, 2010. "The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: A longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 593-609, November.
    6. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    7. Nooteboom, Bart & Van Haverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & Gilsing, Victor & van den Oord, Ad, 2007. "Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1016-1034, September.
    8. Choi, Jin-Uk & Lee, Chang-Yang, 2022. "The differential effects of basic research on firm R&D productivity: The conditioning role of technological diversification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Köhler, Christian & Sofka, Wolfgang & Grimpe, Christoph, 2009. "Selectivity in search strategies for innovation: from incremental to radical, from manufacturing to services," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-066, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Sylvia Maxfield, 2008. "Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights from Economic Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 367-377, June.
    11. Wadhwa, Anu & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2016. "Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 95-112.
    12. A. Madureira & F. Hartog & N. Baken, 2016. "A holonic framework to understand and apply information processes in evolutionary economics: survey and proposal," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 157-190, September.
    13. Juan Alberto Aragon‐Correa & Dante I. Leyva‐de la Hiz, 2016. "The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource‐Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 421-434, September.
    14. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Rakesh B. Sambharya & Jooh Lee, 2014. "Renewing Dynamic Capabilities Globally: An Empirical Study of the World’s Largest MNCs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 137-169, April.
    16. Tomi Tura & Vesa Harmaakorpi, 2005. "Measuring Regional Innovative Capability," ERSA conference papers ersa05p680, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Jose Arias-Pérez & Geovanny Perdomo-Charry & Carlos Castaño-Ríos, 2017. "Not-Invented-Here Syndrome And Innovation Performance: The Confounding Effect Of Innovation Capabilities As Organisational Routines In Service Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Frank T. Rothaermel & Andrew M. Hess, 2007. "Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 898-921, December.
    19. Lewandowska Małgorzata Stefania, 2015. "Capturing Absorptive Capacity: Concepts, Determinants, Measurement Modes and Role in Open Innovation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 45(1), pages 32-56, March.
    20. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & JinSeu Park, 2016. "Network Analysis of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:32011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.