IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse12/60384.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Continuing erosion of consumer protection remedies for telecommunications services in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Cherry, Barbara A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Cherry, Barbara A., 2012. "Continuing erosion of consumer protection remedies for telecommunications services in the U.S," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60384, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse12:60384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60384/1/720212413.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald R. Faulhaber & Gary Madden & Jeffrey Petchey (ed.), 2012. "Regulation and the Performance of Communication and Information Networks," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14325.
    2. Cherry, Barbara A., 0. "Consumer sovereignty: New boundaries for telecommunications and broadband access," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 11-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cherry, Barbara A., 2014. "Historical mutilation: How misuse of 'public utility and 'natural monopoly' misdirects US telecommunications policy development," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106881, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Cherry, Barbara A., 2015. "Technology transitions within telecommunications networks: Lessons from U.S. vs. Canadian policy experimentation under federalism," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 463-485.
    3. Brett M. Frischmann & Christiaan Hogendorn, 2015. "Retrospectives: The Marginal Cost Controversy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    4. Hoernig, Steffen & Bourreau, Marc & Cambini, Carlo, 2015. "Fixed-mobile substitution and termination rates," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 65-76.
    5. Mwakatumbula, Hilda Jacob & Moshi, Goodiel Charles & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2019. "Consumer protection in the telecommunication sector: A comparative institutional analysis of five African countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    6. Peter Broer & Gijsbert Zwart, 2013. "Optimal regulation of lumpy investments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 177-196, October.
    7. Christiaan Hogendorn & Brett Frischmann, 2020. "Infrastructure and general purpose technologies: a technology flow framework," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 469-488, December.
    8. Cherry, Barbara A., 2011. "Radical experimentation under deregulatory broadband policies: The rise of shadow common carriers," 8th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Taipei 2011: Convergence in the Digital Age 52340, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Cherry, Barbara A., 2021. "The Legal Battle over Telecommunications Service Classification in the U.S.: From Network Neutrality to Voice-Over-Internet Protocol Service," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238015, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Neumann, Karl-Heinz & Vogelsang, Ingo, 2013. "How to price the unbundled local loop in the transition from copper to fiber access networks?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 893-909.
    11. Cherry, Barbara A., 2013. "Policymaking for the PSTN-to-IP transition within federalism: Lessons from US v. Canadian experimentation," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88518, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Vogelsang Ingo, 2013. "The Endgame of Telecommunications Policy? A Survey," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 193-270, December.
    13. Lee, Dongyeol, 2015. "Regulating termination charges in asymmetric oligopolies," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 16-28.
    14. Tripathi, Madhulika & Phillips, Braden & Sorell, Matthew, 2019. "Bring your own spectrum (BYOS) – A tiered architecture supporting flexible spectrum allocation," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205218, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Cherry, Barbara A., 2011. "Legal gaps under deregulatory broadband policies and the resurgent rise of corporate power," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52207, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Freyens, Benoît Pierre & Loney, Mark & Dissanayake, Tharaka, 2014. "Dynamic usage of narrowband spectrum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 173-185.
    17. de Kervenoael, Ronan & Palmer, Mark & Hallsworth, Alan, 2013. "From the outside in: Consumer anti-choice and policy implications in the mobile gaming market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 439-449.
    18. Jerry Ellig & Paul LaFontaine & Wayne Leighton & Eric Ralph & Sean Sullivan, 2018. "Economics at the FCC, 2017–2018: Internet Freedom, International Broadband Pricing Comparisons, and a New Office of Economics and Analytics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(4), pages 681-707, December.
    19. Cherry, Barbara A., 2015. "Historical distortion: How misuse of "public utility and "natural monopoly" misdirects U.S. telecommunications policy development," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146320, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Martinez, Luis & Alvarez, Oscar Alvarez & Markendahl, Jan, 2015. "Study of the potential impact of Quality-of-Experience based services on Net Neutrality principles," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127168, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse12:60384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.