IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hwwirp/188.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Boll, Christina
  • Lagemann, Andreas

Abstract

Diese Studie untersucht das Erwerbs- und Kitanutzungsverhalten von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland. Wir nutzen die Wellen 2007-2015 des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) mit den Migrantenstichproben M1 und M2, um signifikante Assoziationen zwischen Migrationshintergrund und Erwerbswahrscheinlichkeit, Arbeitsstunden und Kitanutzungswahrscheinlichkeit unter Kontrolle von Humankapital-, Haushalts-, Milieu- und Makrofaktoren zu identifizieren. Dabei korrigieren wir für Selbstselektion in Beschäftigung und potenzielle Endogenität der Kitanutzung. Wir finden keine Bestätigung für einen eigenständigen Einfluss eines Migrationshintergrunds auf die Kitanutzung der Mütter. Allerdings nutzen Mütter mit südeuropäischen Wurzeln und jüngstem Kind im Alter 3 bis 5 Jahre seltener Kindertagesbetreuung als Mütter ohne Migrationshintergrund. Zur Erwerbswahrscheinlichkeit der Mütter beider Kindesaltersgruppen hat der Migrationshintergrund signifikant negative Bezüge. Ein direkter (indirekter) Migrationshintergrund geht, verglichen mit keinem Migrationshintergrund, bei sonst gleichen Müttermerkmalen mit einer um 6,3 % (5,9 %) niedrigeren Erwerbswahrscheinlichkeit bei Müttern jüngster Kinder unter 3 Jahren einher. Bei Müttern jüngster Kinder von 3-5 Jahren sind es 8,0 % (6,7 %). Mütter jüngster Kinder unter 3 Jahren (im Alter 3 bis 5 Jahre) mit Wurzeln in arabisch-muslimischen Ländern haben eine um 7,1 % (21,1 %) geringere Erwerbswahrscheinlichkeit. Letztere steigt zudem mit der Aufenthaltsdauer in Deutschland. Zur (konditionalen) Wochenarbeitszeit finden wir keine signifikanten Assoziationen des Migrationshintergrunds. Zusammenfassend zeigt sich, dass über die ökonomischen Motive hinaus auch kulturelle Faktoren und grundlegende Orientierungen und Werthaltungen das alltagspraktische Handeln der Mütter, gemessen im Erwerbsverhalten und der Kitanutzung, prägen.

Suggested Citation

  • Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland," HWWI Research Papers 188, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hwwirp:188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/187436/1/1040992943.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marvin Bürmann & Peter Haan & Martin Kroh & Kent Troutman, 2018. "Beschäftigung und Bildungsinvestitionen von Geflüchteten in Deutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(42), pages 919-928.
    2. Joachim R. Frick & Olaf Groh-Samberg & Henning Lohmann, 2008. "Biography and Life History Data in the German Socio Economic Panel: (Up to Wave X, 2007)," Data Documentation 36, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "Introduction to "Schooling, Experience, and Earnings"," NBER Chapters, in: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, pages 1-4, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Karl Brenke, 2008. "Migranten in Berlin: schlechte Jobchancen, geringe Einkommen, hohe Transferabhängigkeit," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 75(35), pages 496-507.
    5. Fuchs, Johann & Kubis, Alexander & Schneider, Lutz, 2016. "Replacement migration from a labour market perspective : Germany's long-term potential labour force and immigration from non-EU member countries," IAB-Discussion Paper 201604, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Helmut Rainer & Stefan Bauernschuster & Wolfgang Auer & Natalia Danzer & Mine Hancioglu & Bastian Hartmann & Timo Hener & Christian Holzner & Notburga Ott & Janina Reinkowski & Martin Werding, 2013. "Kinderbetreuung," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 59, October.
    7. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "Schooling, Experience, and Earnings," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number minc74-1, March.
    8. Christina Boll & Julian Sebastian Leppin & Klaus Schömann, 2016. "Who is overeducated and why? Probit and dynamic mixed multinomial logit analyses of vertical mismatch in East and West Germany," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 639-662, November.
    9. Juliane Frederike Stahl & Pia Sophia Schober, 2018. "Convergence or Divergence? Educational Discrepancies in Work-Care Arrangements of Mothers with Young Children in Germany," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(4), pages 629-649, August.
    10. Knize Estrada, Veronika J., 2018. "Migrant women labor-force participation in Germany : Human capital, segmented labor market, and gender perspectives," IAB-Discussion Paper 201812, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Sophia Schmitz & C. Katharina Spieß, 2018. "Kita-Pflicht für Kinder ab drei Jahren wäre wenig zielgenau," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(19), pages 405-412.
    12. Kaas Leo & Manger Christian, 2012. "Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Alexandra Kröll & Rainald Borck, 2013. "The Influence of Child Care on Maternal Health and Mother-Child Interaction," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 615, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    14. Friedberg, Rachel M, 2000. "You Can't Take It with You? Immigrant Assimilation and the Portability of Human Capital," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(2), pages 221-251, April.
    15. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1993. "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195060119.
    16. Chiswick, Barry R., 1999. "Are Immigrants Favorably Self-Selected? An Economic Analysis," Working Papers 147, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    17. Müller, Kai-Uwe & Wrohlich, Katharina & Sengül, Denise, 2016. "Does subsidized care for toddlers increase maternal labor supply? Evidence from a large-scale expansion of early childcare," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145654, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "Schooling and Earnings," NBER Chapters, in: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, pages 41-63, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Heckman, James J, 1978. "Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 931-959, July.
    20. Gert G. Wagner & Joachim R. Frick & Jürgen Schupp, 2007. "The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancements," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 127(1), pages 139-169.
    21. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    22. van Ham, Maarten & Büchel, Felix, 2004. "Unwilling or Unable? Spatial, Institutional and Socio-Economic Restrictions on Females' Labor Market Access," IZA Discussion Papers 1034, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    23. Frauke H. Peter & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund in Kindertageseinrichtungen und Horten: Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen nicht vernachlässigen!," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(1/2), pages 12-21.
    24. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    25. Barry Chiswick, 1999. "Are Immigrants Favorably Self-Selected?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 181-185, May.
    26. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede verstärken sich in Ost und West," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 986-994.
    27. Christina Boll & Julian Sebastian Leppin, 2016. "Differential Overeducation in East and West Germany: Extending Frank's Theory on Economic Returns Changes the Picture of Disadvantaged Women," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 30(4), pages 455-504, December.
    28. Thomas Liebig & Kristian Rose Tronstad, 2018. "Triple Disadvantage?: A first overview of the integration of refugee women," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 216, OECD Publishing.
    29. Joachim R. Frick & Henning Lohmann (Eds.), 2010. "Biography and Life History Data in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP, v26, 1984-2009)," Data Documentation 52, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    30. Markus M. Grabka & Jan Goebel, 2018. "Einkommensverteilung in Deutschland: Realeinkommen sind seit 1991 gestiegen, aber mehr Menschen beziehen Niedrigeinkommen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(21), pages 449-459.
    31. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Frühe Förderung und Betreuung von Kindern: bedeutende Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme besonders in den ersten Lebensjahren," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(43), pages 17-28.
    32. Mundlak, Yair, 1978. "On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 69-85, January.
    33. Jan Goebel & C. Katharina Spieß & Nils R. J. Witte & Susanne Gerstenberg, 2007. "Die Verknüpfung des SOEP mit MICROM-Indikatoren: Der MICROM-SOEP Datensatz," Data Documentation 26, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    34. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2017. "Public childcare and maternal labour supply: New evidence for Germany," HWWI Research Papers 180, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    35. Jonas Jessen & Sophia Schmitz & C. Katharina Spieß & Sevrin Waights, 2018. "Kita-Besuch hängt trotz ausgeweitetem Rechtsanspruch noch immer vom Familienhintergrund ab," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(38), pages 825-835.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg," HWWI Policy Papers 112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2019. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg. Kurzfassung," HWWI Policy Papers 113, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    4. Scheller, Friedrich, 2017. "The ambiguous role of ethnic context: A multi-level analysis of the relationship between group size and labor market integration of three immigrant groups in Germany," Duisburger Beiträge zur soziologischen Forschung 2017-03, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Sociology.
    5. Knize Estrada, Veronika J., 2018. "Migrant women labor-force participation in Germany : Human capital, segmented labor market, and gender perspectives," IAB-Discussion Paper 201812, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Boris Heizmann & Anne Busch-Heizmann & Elke Holst, 2017. "Immigrant Occupational Composition and the Earnings of Immigrants and Natives in Germany: Sorting or Devaluation?," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 475-505, June.
    7. Jens Ruhose, 2015. "Microeconometric Analyses on Economic Consequences of Selective Migration," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 61.
    8. Mattia Filomena, 2021. "Unemployment Scarring Effects: A Symposium On Empirical Literature," Working Papers 453, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    9. Wu, Na & Wang, Qunyong, 2018. "Wage penalty of overeducation: New micro-evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 206-217.
    10. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    11. Fossen, Frank M. & Büttner, Tobias J.M., 2013. "The returns to education for opportunity entrepreneurs, necessity entrepreneurs, and paid employees," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 66-84.
    12. Anne Busch & Elke Holst, 2012. "Occupational Sex Segregation and Management-Level Wages in Germany: What Role Does Firm Size Play?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1206, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Ferreira, Maria & de Grip, Andries & van der Velden, Rolf, 2018. "Does informal learning at work differ between temporary and permanent workers? Evidence from 20 OECD countries," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 18-40.
    14. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2018. "Économétrie & Machine Learning," Working Papers hal-01568851, HAL.
    15. Saule Kemelbayeva, 2020. "Returns to schooling in Kazakhstan: an update using a pseudo-panel approach," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(3), pages 437-487, September.
    16. Eric A. Hanushek & Jens Ruhose & Ludger Woessmann, 2017. "Knowledge Capital and Aggregate Income Differences: Development Accounting for US States," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 184-224, October.
    17. Busch, Anne & Holst, Elke, 2013. "Geschlechtsspezifische Verdienstunterschiede bei Führungskräften und sonstigen Angestellten in Deutschland: Welche Relevanz hat der Frauenanteil im Beruf?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 315-336.
    18. Hanan Morsy & Adamon N. Mukasa, 2019. "Working Paper 326 - Youth Jobs, Skill and Educational Mismatches in Africa," Working Paper Series 2452, African Development Bank.
    19. Carl Lin, 2016. "How Do Immigrants From Taiwan Fare In The U.S. Labor Market?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(05), pages 1-38, December.
    20. Abdurrahman Aydemir, 2003. "Are Immigrants Positively or Negatively Selected? The Role of Immigrant Selection Criteria and Self-Selection," Labor and Demography 0306002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mütterliche Erwerbstätigkeit; Arbeitsstunden; Kinderbetreuung; Migrationshintergrund; Milieu; IV-Schätzung; 2SLS; Bivariates Probit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J61 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hwwirp:188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hwwiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.